首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling >Stereotypical behavioural cues - but not their order - influence credibility judgements
【24h】

Stereotypical behavioural cues - but not their order - influence credibility judgements

机译:陈规定型的行为线索 - 但不是他们的秩序 - 影响可信度判断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To what extent stereotypical deceptive behaviours such as gaze aversion and fidgeting actually influence people's credibility judgements remain largely unknown. In this study, we directly manipulated the presence/absence of such behaviours to investigate this. Participants were shown four truthful videos in which we manipulated the presence of stereotypical cues and asked them to judge how credible the person in each video is. Moreover, research consistently shows that decision making is influenced by various cognitive biases. One example is the primacy effect, which implies that people form an opinion early in the decision process. Information acquired early will have the largest influence on how subsequent information will be interpreted. To investigate a possible primacy effect, we also manipulated whether these cues were present towards the beginning or the end of the video (i.e. the timing of the manipulation). In line with our expectations, the presence of stereotypical cues significantly lowered the observed credibility, showing that the presence of these cues indeed influences credibility judgements. The timing of the cues had no effect.
机译:在多大程度上,凝视厌恶和诱惑的陈规定型欺骗行为实际上影响人们的信誉判断仍然很大程度上是未知数。在这项研究中,我们直接操纵这些行为的存在/不存在以调查这一点。参与者被示出了四个真实的视频,我们操纵了陈规定型线索的存在,并要求他们判断每个视频中的人有多可靠。此外,研究一致地表明决策受各种认知偏差的影响。一个例子是最初的效果,这意味着人们在决策过程中提前形成了意见。提前获得的信息将对后续信息如何解释的影响最大。为了调查可能的灵平效果,我们还可以操纵这些线索是否朝向视频的开头或末尾存在(即操纵的时间)。符合我们的期望,陈规定型提示的存在显着降低了观察到的可信度,表明这些提示的存在确实影响了可信度判断。提示的时间没有效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号