首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling >Human versus Machine: A Comparison of the Accuracy of Geographic Profiling Methods
【24h】

Human versus Machine: A Comparison of the Accuracy of Geographic Profiling Methods

机译:人与机器:地理剖析方法准确性的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The current article addresses the continuing debate as to the accuracy of geographic profiling methods in predicting the location of serial crime offenders. In particular, the research addresses whether spatial distribution methods and humans using simple heuristics are as accurate at predicting home locations of offenders as more complex algorithm-based methods such as RIGEL, DRAGNET, and Crimestat. Using a random sample of solved serial crimes, the research found that predictions by human judges and spatial distribution methods performed equally as well as more complex algorithm-based methods. In addition to a discussion of findings, implications for police investigations and researchers are included.
机译:本文讨论了关于地理分布图方法在预测连环犯罪者的位置方面的准确性的持续辩论。尤其是,该研究解决了空间分配方法和使用简单启发式方法的人员是否能够像更复杂的基于算法的方法(如RIGEL,DRAGNET和Crimestat)一样准确地预测犯罪者的住所。使用已解决的系列犯罪的随机样本,研究发现,由人类法官和空间分布方法进行的预测与基于算法的复杂方法一样,具有同等的效果。除了讨论发现之外,还包括对警察调查和研究人员的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号