首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Trade Law and Policy >Emissions trading and the GATS financial services provisions: A case study of the Australian carbon pricing mechanism
【24h】

Emissions trading and the GATS financial services provisions: A case study of the Australian carbon pricing mechanism

机译:排放交易和GATS金融服务条款:以澳大利亚碳定价机制为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine whether greenhouse gas (GHG) tradeable instruments will be classified as financial products within the scope of the World Trade Organization (WTO) law and to explore the implications of this finding. Design/methodology/approach - This purpose is achieved through examination of the units of the Australian carbon pricing mechanism (the CPM), namely eligible emissions units. These units are analysed through the lens of the definition of financial products provided in the General Agreement for Trade in Services (the GATS). Findings - This paper finds that eligible emissions units will be classified as financial instruments, and therefore the provisions that govern their trade will be regulated by the GATS. Considering this, this paper explores the limitations that are introduced by the Australian legislation on the trade of eligible emissions units. Research limitations/implications - This paper is limited in its analysis to the Australian CPM. In order to draw conclusions on the issues raised by this analysis, it is necessary to consider the WTO requirements against an operating emissions trading scheme. The Australian CPM presents a contemporary model of an appropriate scheme. Originality/value - The findings in this paper are crucial in a GHG-constrained society. This is because emissions trading schemes (ETSs) are becoming popular measures for pricing GHG emissions, and for this reason the units that are traded and surrendered for emissions liabilities must be classified appropriately on a global scale. Failing to do this could result in differential treatment that may be contrary to the intentions of important global agreements, such as the WTO-covered agreements.
机译:目的-本文的目的是确定是否在世界贸易组织(WTO)法律范围内将温室气体(GHG)可交易工具归类为金融产品,并探讨这一发现的含义。设计/方法/方法-此目的是通过检查澳大利亚碳定价机制(CPM)的单位,即合格的排放单位来实现的。通过《服务贸易总协定》(GATS)中定义的金融产品定义来分析这些单位。调查结果-本文发现符合条件的排放单位将被归类为金融工具,因此,有关其贸易的规定将由GATS规范。考虑到这一点,本文探讨了澳大利亚有关合格排放单位贸易的立法所引入的限制。研究局限性/意义-本文的分析仅限于澳大利亚CPM。为了就此分析提出的问题得出结论,有必要将WTO要求与经营性排放权交易计划进行比较。澳大利亚CPM提出了一种合适方案的当代模型。原创性/价值-本文的研究结果在温室气体约束的社会中至关重要。这是因为排放交易计划(ETS)已成为对GHG排放定价的流行方法,因此,必须在全球范围内对归类为排放责任而交易和交出的单位进行适当分类。不这样做可能会导致区别对待,这可能与重要的全球协议(例如WTO涵盖的协议)的意图背道而驰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号