首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >The Optimal Carbon Emission Reduction and Prices with Cap and Trade Mechanism and Competition
【2h】

The Optimal Carbon Emission Reduction and Prices with Cap and Trade Mechanism and Competition

机译:具有限额交易机制和竞争的最优碳减排量和价格

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

More and more countries employ the Carbon Cap and Trade mechanism (CCT-mechanism) to stimulate the manufacturer to produce much more eco-friendly products. In this paper, we study how the CCT-mechanism affects competitive manufacturers’ product design and pricing strategies. Assume that there are two competitive manufacturers; we give the optimal closed form solutions of the carbon emission reduction rates and retail prices in the Nash game model and the Stackelberg game model with CCT-mechanism, respectively. Additionally, we also discuss the impacts of CCT-mechanism, consumer environmental awareness (CEA), and the sensitivity of switchovers toward price on the optimal carbon emission reduction rates, retail prices, and manufacturers’ profits. We find that (i) when the carbon quota is not enough, there is a trade off between investing in producing much greener product and purchasing carbon quota; when the carbon price is not high, the manufacturer tends to purchase the carbon quota; and when the carbon price is much higher, the manufacturer is more willing to increase the environmental quality of the product; (ii) manufacturer’s size affects product’s emission reduction rate and manufacturer’s optimal profit; larger manufacturer tends to produce much greener product, but it does not mean that he could obtain much more money than the small manufacturer; and (iii) the decision sequence changes manufacturer’s strategies; the optimal emission reduction rate in Nash and Stackelberg game models are almost the same, but the differences of prices and profits between Nash and Stackelberg model’s are much bigger.
机译:越来越多的国家采用碳限额和贸易机制(CCT机制)来刺激制造商生产更多环保产品。在本文中,我们研究了CCT机制如何影响竞争性制造商的产品设计和定价策略。假设有两个有竞争力的制造商;我们分别在带有CCT机制的Nash博弈模型和Stackelberg博弈模型中分别给出了碳减排率和零售价格的最优封闭形式解决方案。此外,我们还将讨论CCT机制,消费者环保意识(CEA)以及价格转换对最佳碳减排率,零售价格和制造商利润的敏感性。我们发现:(i)在碳配额不足的情况下,在投资于生产更绿色产品的生产与购买碳配额之间存在权衡;当碳价不高时,制造商倾向于购买碳配额;当碳价高得多时,制造商更愿意提高产品的环境质量; (ii)制造商的规模会影响产品的减排率和制造商的最佳利润;较大的制造商倾向于生产绿色产品,但这并不意味着他可以获得比小型制造商更多的钱; (iii)决策顺序改变了制造商的策略; Nash和Stackelberg游戏模型的最佳减排率几乎相同,但是Nash和Stackelberg模型之间的价格和利润差异更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号