首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Money and Finance >Openness, the sacrifice ratio, and inflation: Is there a puzzle?
【24h】

Openness, the sacrifice ratio, and inflation: Is there a puzzle?

机译:开放性,牺牲率和通货膨胀:是否存在困惑?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The standard time-inconsistency-based explanation for the negative correlation between openness and inflation requires an inverse relationship between the sacrifice ratio and openness, but Daniels et al. (2005, Openness, central bank independence, and the sacrifice ratio. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 37 (2), 371—379.) have provided evidence that controlling for central bank independence reveals a positive relationship. This paper embeds the time-inconsistency approach within a model of a multisector, imperfectly competitive, open economy. In this setting, greater openness raises the sacrifice ratio but reduces the inflation bias. Thus, failure to observe an inverse relationship between openness and the sacrifice ratio does not necessarily imply that the time-inconsistency approach is irrelevant to understanding the openness—inflation relationship.
机译:基于开放时间和通货膨胀之间负相关性的基于时间不一致的标准解释要求牺牲率和开放度之间存在反比关系,但Daniels等人。 (2005年,开放性,中央银行独立性和牺牲率。《货币,信贷与银行杂志》 37(2),371-379。)提供了证据,表明控制中央银行独立性显示出正相关关系。本文将时间不一致的方法嵌入到多部门,不完全竞争,开放经济的模型中。在这种情况下,更大的开放度会提高牺牲率,但会降低通胀偏差。因此,未能观察到开放度与牺牲率之间的反比关系并不一定意味着时间不一致方法与理解开放度-通货膨胀关系无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号