首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l'integration et de la migration internationale >Empowerment or Intrusion? The Input and Output Legitimacy of Introductory Programs for Recent Immigrants
【24h】

Empowerment or Intrusion? The Input and Output Legitimacy of Introductory Programs for Recent Immigrants

机译:授权还是入侵?新移民入门课程的输入和输出合法性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent changes in the social policy regimes of western European countries have raised questions about the normative legitimacy of policy measures. Welfare states may face difficult dilemmas when efficient social policy measures clash with principles of the liberal state, like equal treatment and individual autonomy. Is output legitimacy achieved at the expense of the input legitimacy dimensions of individual autonomy and human dignity? In this paper, a standard for evaluating the normative legitimacy of social policy interventions is proposed, and subsequently applied on the concrete example of the Norwegian introductory programs for immigrants. The paper concludes that activation measures in some of its implementations may actually represent fewer threats to input legitimacy than does the alternative regime of unconditional social assistance.
机译:西欧国家社会政策制度的最新变化引起了人们对政策措施规范性合法性的质疑。当有效的社会政策措施与自由主义国家的原则(例如平等待遇和个人自治)相冲突时,福利国家可能会面临困境。是否以牺牲个人自治和人的尊严的输入合法性为代价来实现输出合法性?在本文中,提出了评估社会政策干预措施规范性合法性的标准,随后将其应用于挪威移民入门计划的具体示例。本文的结论是,与其他无条件社会援助制度相比,在其某些实施中的激活措施实际上可能对输入合法性的威胁更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号