...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Criminal Justice >Investigation and Prosecution of Large-scale Crimes at the International Level
【24h】

Investigation and Prosecution of Large-scale Crimes at the International Level

机译:国际一级的大规模犯罪的调查和起诉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although the prosecution of large-scale crimes at the international level shares some similarities to the prosecution of organized crime at the national level, there are a number of important differences that make the two areas hardly comparable. Two distinctive traits of international criminal proceedings stand out in this regard: (i) the lack of any enforcement agency that would allow prosecuting authorities to carry out investigations on the territory of an interested state without its assistance and the absence of a general power to carry out such arrests, which render state cooperation of prime importance and (ii) the fact that the procedural model of international criminal tribunals is mixed containing elements of accusatorial (common law) as well as inquisitorial (civil law) systems. As far as prosecutions are concerned, useful concepts and procedures adopted from both legal traditions can be found in the Statute, the Rules of Procedure and Evidence as well as in the approach of prosecutors, defence counsel and judges to the introduction of evidence and, more generally, to the manner in which proceedings are conducted. One of the main examples of this is the acceptance of proof of facts by means other than oral evidence as a result of the influence of the civil law tradition, which has progressively made its way in the procedural system of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Yet, on the other hand, some methods normally resorted to in national criminal prosecution may turn out to be useful at the international level, such as resorting to insider witnesses. Although known to domestic systems, such practice may have a particular significance in the context of the prosecution of international crimes. So have additional forms of criminal participation (such as the notion of joint criminal enterprise). Only a mixing of traditional and innovative investigative tools and the proper balance of the different legal cultures can ensure effective prosecution of international crimes.
机译:尽管在国际一级对大规模犯罪的起诉与在国家一级对有组织犯罪的起诉具有某些相似之处,但仍有许多重要差异使这两个领域难以相提并论。在这方面,国际刑事诉讼有两个鲜明的特点:(i)没有任何执法机构可以使检察机关在没有其协助的情况下对一个有关国家的领土进行调查,并且没有一般的执行权排除此类逮捕,这使国家合作具有最重要的意义;(ii)国际刑事法庭的程序模型混合在一起,包含了检察(普通法)和审问(民法)体系。就起诉而言,可以从《规约》,《程序和证据规则》以及检察官,辩护律师和法官介绍证据的方式中找到从两种法律传统中采用的有用概念和程序。通常,以进行诉讼的方式为准。这方面的主要例子之一是由于民法传统的影响而通过口头证据以外的其他方式接受事实证明,这在前者国际刑事法庭的程序体系中逐渐发展起来。南斯拉夫(ICTY)。但是,另一方面,在国家层面上通常采用的某些刑事诉讼方法在国际上可能是有用的,例如诉诸内幕证人。尽管这种做法在国内系统中是众所周知的,但在起诉国际罪行的背景下可能具有特别的意义。还有其他形式的犯罪​​参与(例如,联合犯罪企业的概念)。只有将传统和创新的调查手段结合在一起,并适当平衡各种法律文化,才能确保有效起诉国际罪行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号