...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Criminal Justice >The Article 12(3) Declaration of the Palestinian Authority, the International Criminal Court and International Law
【24h】

The Article 12(3) Declaration of the Palestinian Authority, the International Criminal Court and International Law

机译:巴勒斯坦权力机构,国际刑事法院和国际法第12(3)条宣言

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article analyses the validity of the Palestinian Authority (PA) Declaration of February 2009 purporting to accept the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court under Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute, which requires the declarant be a state. After reaffirming that Palestine is currently not a state under public international law, the article examines the arguments claiming that Palestine should be regarded as such for the purposes of the Rome Statute whether because the Statute should be taken as incorporating non-state entities or on account of the existing jurisdictional capacity of the PA. It is concluded that neither argument is sustainable. No reasonable interpretation of ‘state’ in Article 12(3) in the light of the object and purpose of the Rome Statute can extend that term to include non-state entities of whatever hue, while no acceptable reading of the existing jurisdictional capacity of the PA can encompass anything approximating to the satisfaction of the required criteria. Attempts to stretch the interpretation of Article 12(3) beyond the credible might well have deleterious consequences for the Court.
机译:本文分析了2009年2月《巴勒斯坦权力机构宣言》的有效性,该宣言声称要接受《罗马规约》第12条第3款规定的国际刑事法院的管辖权,该宣言要求声明者是一个国家。在重申巴勒斯坦目前不是国际公法中的一个国家之后,该条审查了主张根据《罗马规约》应将巴勒斯坦视为该国的论点,无论是因为该规约应被视为纳入了非国家实体还是出于考虑巴勒斯坦权力机构现有的司法管辖权。结论是,任何论点都不可持续。鉴于《罗马规约》的目的和宗旨,对第12条第3款中“国家”的合理解释不能将该术语扩展为包括任何色调的非国家实体,而不能接受对现有国家管辖权的理解。 PA可以包含满足要求标准的任何近似值。试图将第十二条第(3)款的解释扩大到可信范围之外,可能会对法院造成不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号