...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics >Preferences over Punishment and Reward Mechanisms in Social Dilemmas
【24h】

Preferences over Punishment and Reward Mechanisms in Social Dilemmas

机译:社会困境中对惩罚和奖励机制的偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The existing results from literature on preferences over sanctions in social dilemmas are inconclusive. Our experimental setup allows us to study both preferences over punishment and reward mechanisms and preferences over their levels of effectiveness. We show that the voluntary contribution mechanism (VCM) with reward is the most favored and the most efficient institution, although the VCM with punishment leads to higher contributions. Subjects prefer extreme values of the sanctioning technologies, and contributions increase in the level of effectiveness. There is no difference in the voting pattern between a partner- and a stranger-matching treatment. (JEL: C72, C91, C92)
机译:关于社会困境中对制裁的偏好的文献的现有结果尚无定论。我们的实验设置使我们能够研究对惩罚和奖励机制的偏爱以及对有效性的偏爱。我们显示,尽管带有惩罚的VCM会带来更高的贡献,但带有奖励的自愿贡献机制(VCM)是最受青睐和最有效的制度。受试者更喜欢制裁技术的极端价值,并且贡献会提高有效性水平。伴侣和陌生人配对的投票方式没有区别。 (JEL:C72,C91,C92)

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Univ Munich, Geschwister Scholl Pl 1, D-80539 Munich, Germany|Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia|Gothenburg Univ, S-41124 Gothenburg, Sweden;

    Univ Munich, Geschwister Scholl Pl 1, D-80539 Munich, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号