...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Insect Behavior >Visual Communication Behaviour as a Mechanism Behind Reproductive Interference in Three Pygmy Grasshoppers (Genus Tetrix, Tetrigidae, Orthoptera)
【24h】

Visual Communication Behaviour as a Mechanism Behind Reproductive Interference in Three Pygmy Grasshoppers (Genus Tetrix, Tetrigidae, Orthoptera)

机译:视觉传达行为是三只侏儒蚱((四属,四足类,直翅类)繁殖干扰的机制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Specific mate recognition systems should enable species to recognize conspecific mates correctly. However, heterospecific matings have been observed in a variety of taxa. One of these cases is the pygmy grasshopper genus Tetrix, in which three species show sexual interactions. T. ceperoi males mount preferably females of T. subulata, but they are rejected as mates. T. subulata males prefer T. undulata females over conspecific females and heterospecific matings occur. Here, we study the underlying behavioural mechanisms of this pattern by analysing the visual courtship behaviour of the three species videographically. We test the hypothesis that the displays of T. ceperoi are highly differentiated from the other species, while the courtship of T. subulata and T. undulata is more similar. This is supported by our results: while T. ceperoi males perform a fast movement of high amplitude (“pronotal bobbing”), the other two species show only minor movements (“lateral swinging,” “frontal swinging”). The first function of a discriminant analysis of the temporal dimensions of the displays explained 96% of the variance. 100% of the T. ceperoi displays were classified correctly, whereas only 50% of the T. subulata and 81% of the T. undulata displays were grouped accurately. A two-way ANOVA revealed no significant effects of the direction of the “swinging” movements (laterally or frontally) and no interactions between direction and species either, whereas each temporal parameter differed significantly between the three species. The highest degree of differentiation was found between T. ceperoi and T. undulata, while T. subulata and T. undulata only differed significantly in two of the six temporal parameters. Our results suggest that the mismatings between T. undulata and T. subulata are caused by an insufficient specificity of the courtship behaviour. Apparently, ecological segregation of these two species could impede sexual interactions in the field.
机译:特定的配偶识别系统应使物种能够正确识别同种的配偶。但是,已在各种分类中观察到异种交配。其中一种是侏儒蚱hopper属Tetrix,其中三个物种表现出性相互作用。 T. ceperoi雄性最好安装Subulata T. subulata的雌性,但被拒绝为伴侣。乌ul男性比同种女性更喜欢乌女性,并且发生异种交配。在这里,我们通过视频分析三个物种的视觉求爱行为,研究了这种模式的潜在行为机制。我们检验了假山锥虫的展示与其他物种的显着差异的假设,而sub虫和虫的求偶更为相似。我们的研究结果支持了这一点:尽管ce。ceperoi雄性动物表现出高幅度的快速运动(“前胸肌摆动”),但其他两个物种仅表现出较小的运动(“侧向摆动”,“额侧摆动”)。显示器时间维度的判别分析的第一个功能解释了96%的方差。正确分类了100%的T. ceperoi展示,而仅将50%的T. subulata和81%的T. undulata展示准确分类。双向方差分析表明,“摆动”运动的方向(横向或正面)没有显着影响,方向和物种之间也没有相互作用,而三个物种之间的每个时间参数均存在显着差异。 T. ceperoi和T. undulata之间的分化程度最高,而T. subulata和T. undulata仅在六个时间参数中的两个显着不同。我们的结果表明,T。undulata和T. subulata之间的错配是由于求爱行为的特异性不足引起的。显然,这两个物种的生态隔离可能会阻碍田间的性相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号