...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Infrastructure Systems >Revisiting the Strengths and Limitations of Regulatory Contracts in Infrastructure Industries
【24h】

Revisiting the Strengths and Limitations of Regulatory Contracts in Infrastructure Industries

机译:回顾基础设施行业监管合同的优势和局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper evaluates regulation by contract in public-private partnerships (PPPs) in infrastructure services. Although the benefits of competition for the market and of regulatory contracts are widely acknowledged, the literature identifies several failures in their design. These "flaws" are present in both developed and developing countries and arise in all types of contracts. This study analyzes both contractual PPPs and institutionalized PPPs (mixed companies). The evidence suggests that for all kinds of contracts, the major problems tend to arise in the preparation of public tender documents: the "best" bidder is not often the winner. The likely results include redistribution in favor of the private partner, weak incentives for high performance, and renegotiation of contracts. Moreover, risks are not allocated correctly nor is effective monitoring ensured. This review of contract procedures and design allows us to draw several implications for policy makers and to present suggestions and recommendations for improving regulatory contracts.
机译:本文评估了基础设施服务中公私合营伙伴关系(PPP)中合同的监管。尽管竞争市场和监管合同的好处已广为人知,但文献却指出了其设计中的一些失败之处。这些“缺陷”在发达国家和发展中国家都存在,并出现在所有类型的合同中。这项研究分析了合同PPP和制度化PPP(混合公司)。有证据表明,对于所有类型的合同,主要问题往往是在准备公开招标文件时出现的:“最佳”投标人通常不是中标者。可能的结果包括有利于私人合伙人的重新分配,对绩效不佳的激励措施以及合同的重新谈判。此外,风险分配不当,也无法确保有效的监控。对合同程序和设计的审查使我们能够对政策制定者产生一些影响,并提出改进监管合同的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号