首页> 外文期刊>Journal of informetrics >Introducing recalibrated academic performance indicators in the evaluation of individuals' research performance: A case study from Eastern Europe
【24h】

Introducing recalibrated academic performance indicators in the evaluation of individuals' research performance: A case study from Eastern Europe

机译:在评估个人研究绩效中介绍重新校准的学术绩效指标:以东欧为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Hungary, the highest and most prestigious scientific qualification is considered to be the Doctor of Science (DSc) title being awarded by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The academic performance indicators of the DSc title are of high importance in the evaluation of individuals' research performance not only when a researcher applies for obtaining a DSc title, but also during promotions and appointments at universities, and in the case of the evaluation of applications for scientific titles and degrees, and the assessment of applications for funding. In the Section of Earth Sciences encompassing nine related disciplines, rather than carrying out a straightforward bibliometric analysis, the performance indicators were designed as a result of a consensual agreement between leading academicians, each of whom represented a particular discipline. Therefore, the minimum values of the indicators, required to be fulfilled if one is applying for a DSc title, do not adequately reflect the actual discipline-specific performance of researchers. This problem may generate tension between researchers during the evaluation process. The main goal of this paper is to recalibrate the minimum values of four major performance indicators by taking the actual discipline-specific distance ratios into account. In addition, each minimum value will be defined by employing integer and fractional counting methods as well. The research outcome of this study can provide impetus for the Section of Earth Sciences (and eventually other sections of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) to optimize the minimum values of the DSc title performance indicators by taking the specifics of each discipline into account. Because academic performance indicators are also employed in other Eastern European countries in the evaluation of individuals' research performance, the methods used in that paper can be placed into a wider geographical context. (C) 2020 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:在匈牙利,最高和最负盛名的科学资格被认为是匈牙利科学院授予的科学博士(DSC)标题。 DSC标题的学术绩效指标在评估个人的研究表现方面不仅高度重视,不仅当研究人员获得获得DSC标题,而且在大学的促销和任命期间以及在评估申请的情况下对于科学标题和学位,以及对资金申请的评估。在地球科学的一部分包括九个相关学科,而不是进行直接的生学金分析,绩效指标是由于领先的院士之间的同意协议而设计,其中每个人都代表了特定的纪律。因此,如果申请DSC标题,则需要满足指标的最小值,不充分反映研究人员的实际纪律特定表现。这个问题可能在评估过程中的研究人员之间产生紧张。本文的主要目标是通过考虑实际的学科特定距离比来重新校准四个主要性能指标的最小值。此外,每个最小值也将通过使用整数和分数计数方法来定义。本研究的研究结果可以为地球科学的部分(最终匈牙利科学院的其他部分)提供动力,以通过考虑每个学科的细节来优化DSC标题绩效指标的最低价值。由于学术绩效指标也在其他东欧国家雇用在评估个人的研究表现方面,因此可以将该纸张中使用的方法放入更广泛的地域环境中。 (c)2020作者。 elsevier有限公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号