...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of informetrics >Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output
【24h】

Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output

机译:专业研究与多元化研究成果的作者分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present work investigates the relations between amplitude and type of collaboration (intramural, extramural domestic or international) and output of specialized versus diversified research. By specialized or diversified research, we mean within or beyond the author's dominant research topic. The field of observation is the scientific production over five years from about 23,500 academics. The analyses are conducted at the aggregate and disciplinary level. The results lead to the conclusion that in general, the output of diversified research is no more frequently the fruit of collaboration than is specialized research. At the level of the particular collaboration types, international collaborations weakly underlie the specialized kind of research output; on the contrary, extramural domestic and intramural collaborations are weakly associated with diversified research. While the weakness of association remains, exceptions are observed at the level of the individual disciplines. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本工作调查了合作的幅度和类型(内部,国际内部或国际)与专业研究与多元化研究之间的关系。通过专门研究或多元化研究,我们指的是作者主要研究主题之内或之外。观察领域是五年来大约23,500名学者的科学成果。分析是在总体和学科层面上进行的。结果得出的结论是,总的来说,多元化研究的成果比专门研究成果更不经常是合作的成果。在特定合作类型的层面上,国际合作在专业研究成果的基础上薄弱。相反,在校外和校内合作与多元化研究之间的联系较弱。虽然协会的弱点仍然存在,但在各个学科的水平上却观察到了例外。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号