首页> 外文期刊>Journal of industrial and management optimization >FAIRNESS AND RETAILER-LED SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION UNDER TWO DIFFERENT DEGREES OF TRUST
【24h】

FAIRNESS AND RETAILER-LED SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION UNDER TWO DIFFERENT DEGREES OF TRUST

机译:两种不同信任度下的公平和零售商链协调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nowadays, customers are the decisive part in the market. The retailers who are closest to final consumers in a supply chain begin to show their power and thereby dominate the supply chain. Thus, the research about a retailer-led supply chain continues to be a burning question in the recent trade press and academic literature. Our research adds fresh fuel to the fire by studying how one channel member' fairness concern affects the coordination of a two-stage supply chain with a dominant retailer and a supplier. We carry out our investigation in two cases which involve different degrees of trust between the channel members about the unit cost c provided by the supplier. Our analysis shows that if the channel members have the same degree of trust on c-value, the dominant retailer can use a constant markup pricing contract to align the fair-minded supplier's interest with the channel's and coordinate the channel with a wholesale price higher than the supplier's marginal cost; but the coordination fails if the dominant retailer is the only one who cares about fairness, and he obtains a lower profit than nobody cares about fairness. If the dominant retailer and the supplier have different degrees of trust on c-value, the retailer can not coordinate the channel with a markup pricing contract when only the supplier has fairness concerns.
机译:如今,客户已成为市场中的决定性部分。在供应链中最接近最终消费者的零售商开始展示自己的力量,从而主导了供应链。因此,有关零售商主导的供应链的研究一直是最近贸易新闻和学术文献中的一个紧迫问题。我们的研究通过研究一个渠道成员的公平问题如何影响两级供应链与主要零售商和供应商之间的协调,为这场大火提供了新的动力。我们在两种情况下进行调查,这两种情况涉及渠道成员之间对供应商提供的单位成本c的不同信任程度。我们的分析表明,如果渠道成员对c值的信任程度相同,则主导零售商可以使用恒定的加价定价合同,将有主见的供应商的利益与渠道的利益保持一致,并以高于批发价的价格协调渠道。供应商的边际成本;但是,如果主导零售商是唯一关心公平的零售商,那么协调就会失败,并且他获得的利润比没有人关心公平的零售商要低。如果主要零售商和供应商对c值的信任程度不同,则仅当供应商关注公平性时,零售商才能通过加价定价合同协调渠道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号