首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydrologic engineering >Comparative Study of Coupling Approaches for Surface Water and Subsurface Interactions
【24h】

Comparative Study of Coupling Approaches for Surface Water and Subsurface Interactions

机译:地表水与地下相互作用的耦合方法比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the core of an integrated watershed model there is coupling between surface water and subsurface water flows. Recently, interest in hydrology literature, regarding the fully coupled approach for surface and subsurface water interactions, has increased. For example, the assumption of a gradient-type flux equation, based on Darcy's law and the numerical solution of all governing equations in a single global matrix, has been reported. This paper argues that this "fully coupled approach" is only a special case of all possible coupling combinations and, if not applied with caution, the nonphysics interface parameter becomes a calibration tool. Generally, there are two cases of surface/subsurface coupling based on the physical nature of the interface: continuous or discontinuous assumption; when a sediment layer exists at the interface, the discontinuous assumption may be justified. As for numerical schemes, there are three cases: time lagged, iterative, and simultaneous solutions. Since modelers often resort to the simplest, fastest schemes in practical applications, it is desirable to quantify potential errors and the performance specific to each coupling scheme. This paper evaluates these coupling schemes in a watershed model, WASH123D, with numerical experiments. They are designed to compare the performance of each coupling approach for different types of surface water and subsurface interactions. These experiments are evaluated in terms of surface water and subsurface water solutions, along with exchange flux (e.g. infiltration/seepage rate).
机译:在综合流域模型的核心中,地表水和地下水流之间存在耦合。近来,关于水面和地下水相互作用的完全耦合方法的水文学文献的兴趣已经增加。例如,已经报道了基于达西定律的梯度型通量方程的假设以及单个全局矩阵中所有控制方程的数值解。本文认为,这种“完全耦合的方法”只是所有可能的耦合组合的特例,如果不谨慎使用,非物理接口参数将成为校准工具。通常,基于界面的物理性质,存在两种表面/地下耦合的情况:连续或不连续的假设;当界面处存在沉积物层时,不连续假设可能是合理的。对于数值方案,存在三种情况:时滞,迭代和同时解。由于建模人员通常在实际应用中诉诸于最简单,最快的方案,因此希望量化潜在的误差和每种耦合方案特有的性能。本文通过数值实验在分水岭模型WASH123D中评估了这些耦合方案。它们旨在比较每种耦合方法对不同类型的地表水和地下相互作用的性能。这些实验是根据地表水和地下水溶液以及交换通量(例如渗透/渗透率)进行评估的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号