首页> 外文会议>World environmental and water resources congress >Coupling Approaches for Surface Water and Groundwater Interactions inWatershed Modeling
【24h】

Coupling Approaches for Surface Water and Groundwater Interactions inWatershed Modeling

机译:流域建模中地表水与地下水相互作用的耦合方法

获取原文

摘要

In the core of an integrated watershed model is the coupling among surface waterand subsurface water flows. Mathematical, there are two approaches ofsurface/subsurface coupling based on the physical nature of the interface: continuousor discontinuous assumption. Physically, only the continuous case exists in nature.However, when a far less permeable layer exists at the interface, the layer may beremoved for computational efficiency. Under such circumstances, the discontinuoussimplification may be justified. Numerically, there are three strategies of couplingbetween surface water and groundwater water: time-lagged, iterative, andsimultaneous solutions. Current literature is dominated by the discontinuityassumption with the simultaneous solution strategy. Since modelers often resort tothe simplest, fastest schemes in practical applications, it is desirable to quantifypotential errors and the performance specific to each coupling scheme. This paperevaluates these coupling schemes in watershed modeling with WASH123D.Numerical experiments are used to compare the performance of each couplingapproach and strategy for different types of surface water and groundwaterinteractions. These experiments are done in terms of errors in state variables (e.g.,water depth and pressure head) and fluxes (e.g. infiltration/seepage rate). It is foundthat different coupling approaches and strategies are justifiable for only the specificflow problem of physical setting of interfaces and the specific scale of time andspace. Therefore, for practicality and for accurate and efficient simulations, awatershed simulator should include various options of mathematical approaches andnumerical strategies. However, the time-lagged strategy should be avoided since itgenerally produces too much error in solutions in fluxes, thus causing problem ofmass conservation across the interface.
机译:综合分水岭模型的核心是地表水之间的耦合 和地下水流。数学上,有两种方法 基于界面物理性质的表面/次表面耦合:连续 或不连续的假设。从物理上讲,自然界中仅存在连续的情况。 但是,当在界面处存在渗透性差得多的层时,该层可能是 出于计算效率而删除。在这种情况下,不连续 简化可能是有道理的。从数值上讲,存在三种耦合策略 在地表水和地下水之间:时滞,迭代和 同时解决方案。目前的文献主要是不连续性 同时解决方案策略的假设。由于建模者经常求助于 在实际应用中最简单,最快的方案,需要量化 每个耦合方案的潜在错误和性能。这篇报告 使用WASH123D在分水岭建模中评估这些耦合方案。 数值实验用于比较每个联轴器的性能 不同类型的地表水和地下水的方法和策略 互动。这些实验是根据状态变量中的错误(例如, 水深和压头)和通量(例如入渗/渗流率)。找到了 不同的耦合方法和策略仅适用于特定的 接口物理设置的流量问题以及特定的时间范围和 空间。因此,为了实用性和准确有效的模拟, 分水岭模拟器应包括各种数学方法和 数值策略。但是,应避免使用时间滞后的策略,因为它 通常会在通量的溶液中产生太多的误差,从而导致问题 整个接口的质量守恒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号