首页> 外文会议>World Environmental and Water Resources Congress >Coupling Approaches for Surface Water and Groundwater Interactions in Watershed Modeling
【24h】

Coupling Approaches for Surface Water and Groundwater Interactions in Watershed Modeling

机译:流域建模中地表水和地下水相互作用的耦合方法

获取原文

摘要

In the core of an integrated watershed model is the coupling among surface water and subsurface water flows. Mathematical, there are two approaches of surface/subsurface coupling based on the physical nature of the interface: continuous or discontinuous assumption. Physically, only the continuous case exists in nature. However, when a far less permeable layer exists at the interface, the layer may be removed for computational efficiency. Under such circumstances, the discontinuous simplification may be justified, Numerically, there are three strategies of coupling between surface water and groundwater water: time-lagged, iterative, and simultaneous solutions. Current literature is dominated by the discontinuity assumption with the simultaneous solution strategy. Since modelers often resort to the simplest, fastest schemes in practical applications, it is desirable to quantify potential errors and the performance specific to each coupling scheme. This paper evaluates these coupling schemes in watershed modeling with WASH123D. Numerical experiments are used to compare the performance of each coupling approach and strategy for different types of surface water and groundwater interactions,, These experiments are done in terms of errors in state variables (e.g., water depth and pressure head) and fluxes (e.g. infiltration/seepage rate). It is found that different coupling approaches and strategies are justifiable for only the specific flow problem of physical setting of interfaces and the specific scale of time and space. Therefore, for practicality and for accurate and efficient simulations, a watershed simulator should include various options of mathematical approaches and numerical strategies. However, the time-lagged strategy should be avoided since it generally produces too much error in solutions in fluxes, thus causing problem of mass conservation1 across the interface.
机译:在集成的流域模型的核心中是地表水和地下水流动的耦合。数学,基于界面的物理性质,存在两种表面/地下耦合方法:连续或不连续的假设。在物理上,只有连续的情况本质上存在。然而,当在界面处存在远不透水的层时,可以去除该层以用于计算效率。在这种情况下,在数值上,不连续的简化可以是合理的,地表水和地下水水之间有三种耦合策略:时间滞后,迭代和同时解决方案。目前的文献由同时解决方案策略的不连续假设主导。由于建模者通常在实际应用中遵循最简单,最快的方案,因此希望量化潜在的误差和每个耦合方案的性能。本文评估了用WASH123D进行了流域模型中的这些耦合方案。数值实验用于比较各种类型水和地下水相互作用的每个耦合方法和策略的性能,这些实验是在状态变量(例如,水深和压力头)和助熔剂(例如渗透)的误差方面进行的/渗漏速率)。结果发现,只有不同的耦合方法和策略对于仅用于接口的物理设置和特定时间和空间的特定流量问题是合理的。因此,为了实用性和准确,高效的模拟,流域模拟器应包括数学方法的各种选项和数值策略。然而,应该避免时间滞后的策略,因为它通常在助焊剂中产生太多的误差,因此在界面上引起质量保守的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号