...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydrologic engineering >Evaluating the use of Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient in goodness-of-fit measures for daily runoff simulation with SWAT
【24h】

Evaluating the use of Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient in goodness-of-fit measures for daily runoff simulation with SWAT

机译:评估Nash-Sutcliffe效率系数在用SWAT进行日常径流模拟的拟合优度度量中的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Hydrological models must be carefully calibrated to ensure that predictions are scientifically sound and reliable. As a goodnessof- fit measure, an ideal threshold of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (E_(ns)) has been reported to be 0.65, based on yearly and monthly simulation results with the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT). To further explore the use of E_(ns) as a goodness-of-fit measure for daily runoff simulation with SWAT, the authors ran the model with five different parameter values, using Jinjiang River Basin on the southeast coast of China as the study area. In addition, to find how the model versions varied in predicting changes in flood and drought with changes in land use, each of the five model versions were run two times separately: once for the land use condition in 1985, and then again for the land use condition in 2006. The authors investigated the relationships between E_(ns) variation and model accuracy and discussed the differences in predicted runoff due to land use change as caused by the five model versions. The results show that the coefficient of determination (R~2) was highly associated with E_(ns), with a high R~2 corresponding to a high E_(ns); the E_(ns) value was quite sensitive to simulation results of the maximum one-day (1d) runoff; 0.75; the E_(ns) value was not sensitive to simulation results of the minimum 1d and seven-day (7d) runoff, and unlike the flood runoff, the errors in drought flow increased adversely with increased E_(ns), indicating the poor performance of the SWAT model regarding drought flows; and the variations in runoff simulations, due to the land use change, were sensitive to model version switching and were fundamentally similar to the changes in the error indicators said above. The five SWAT versions varied in performance (E_(ns)) in daily runoff simulation and had different measures of goodness-of-fit for various characteristics of the flood and drought processes. As a result, an E_(ns) of 0.75 is suggested as a threshold for satisfactory simulation of maximum 1d discharge in the study watershed.
机译:必须仔细校准水文模型,以确保预测科学可靠。作为拟合优度的衡量标准,基于土壤和水评估工具(SWAT)的年度和月度模拟结果,纳什-舒特克里夫效率系数(E_(ns))的理想阈值据报道为0.65。为了进一步探索利用E_(ns)作为利用SWAT进行日径流模拟的拟合优度度量,作者以中国东南沿海的晋江流域为研究区域,运行了具有五个不同参数值的模型。此外,为了发现模型版本在预测洪水和干旱随土地利用的变化方面的变化,五个模型版本分别进行了两次:一次是针对1985年的土地使用状况,另一次是针对土地2006年的土地利用状况。作者调查了E_(ns)变化与模型准确性之间的关系,并讨论了由五个模型版本引起的土地利用变化导致的预计径流量差异。结果表明,测定系数(R〜2)与E_(ns)高度相关,R〜2高对应于高E_(ns)。 E_(ns)值对最大一天(1d)径流的模拟结果非常敏感; 0.75; E_(ns)值对最小1d和7天(7d)径流的模拟结果不敏感,并且与洪水径流不同,干旱流量的误差随E_(ns)的增加而不利地增加,这表明E_(ns)值表现不佳。关于干旱流量的SWAT模型;由于土地用途的变化,径流模拟的变化对模型版本转换很敏感,并且基本上与上述误差指标的变化相似。五个SWAT版本在日常径流模拟中的性能(E_(ns))有所不同,并且针对洪水和干旱过程的各种特征具有不同的拟合优度度量。结果,建议将E_(ns)设置为0.75,作为对研究分水岭中最大1d排放量进行满意模拟的阈值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号