...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydro-environment research >Influence of VOF technique, turbulence model and discretization scheme on the numerical simulation of the non-aerated, skimming flow in stepped spillways
【24h】

Influence of VOF technique, turbulence model and discretization scheme on the numerical simulation of the non-aerated, skimming flow in stepped spillways

机译:VOF技术,湍流模型和离散化方案对阶梯式溢洪道中非充气撇油流量的数值模拟的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An accurate description of the hydrodynamics in the non-aerated region of the skimming flow on stepped spillways is of outmost importance, particularly in small structures at large discharges. In addition, the flow features upstream of the inception point of air entrainment determine the flow behavior in the downstream self aerated region. In this work, numerical models of the flow in the non-aerated region of stepped spillways have been developed using diverse turbulence closures and discretization schemes implemented in two CFD codes: OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D (R). Partial VOF (Volume of Fluid) and "True" VOF (TruVOF) approaches are employed to capture the position of the free surface. The Standard, RNG and Realizable k-epsilon, in addition to the SST k-omega model, are used for turbulence closure. Numerical results are compared against reference experimental results obtained from a physical model of constant slope of 0.75H:1V. Models with turbulence closures of the k-epsilon family provide nearly the same predictions for the mean flow velocity with maximum differences on average smaller than 1%. Regarding discretization schemes, the first-order upwind method provides predictions for the mean flow velocity which are not significantly different (within 6%) than those obtained with second-order counterparts. However, these differences can be larger when maximum values of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and dissipation rate of TKE at the step edges are compared. In spite of the fact that the TruVOF (FLOW-3D (R)) method does not account for the tangential stresses at the air-water interface, differences in the tracking of the free surface position among this method and the Partial VOF method (OpenFOAM) were found to be smaller than 3% along the stepped spillway. In this work, we also provide a physical interpretation of the flow results.
机译:准确描述阶梯式溢洪道上撇油流量的非充气区域中的流体动力学至关重要,尤其是在大流量下的小型结构中。另外,空气夹带起始点上游的流动特征决定了下游自充气区域的流动行为。在这项工作中,已经通过使用两种CFD代码(OpenFOAM和FLOW-3D(R))中实现的各种湍流闭合和离散化方案,开发了阶梯溢洪道非充气区域中流动的数值模型。使用部分VOF(流体体积)和“ True” VOF(TruVOF)方法来捕获自由表面的位置。除SSTk-ω模型外,Standard,RNG和Realizable k-epsilon还用于湍流封闭。将数值结果与从0.75H:1V恒定斜率的物理模型获得的参考实验结果进行比较。具有kε族湍流闭塞的模型对平均流速几乎提供了相同的预测,平均差异最大小于1%。关于离散化方案,一阶迎风方法提供的平均流速预测与二阶对应方法获得的预测没有显着差异(6%之内)。但是,当比较湍流动能(TKE)的最大值和台阶边缘处TKE的耗散率时,这些差异可能会更大。尽管TruVOF(FLOW-3D(R))方法无法解决气水界面处的切向应力,但该方法与Partial VOF方法之间的自由表面位置追踪差异(OpenFOAM沿着阶梯溢洪道被发现小于3%。在这项工作中,我们还提供了流量结果的物理解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号