...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development >The Impact of Global Economic Crises on the Poor: Comparing the 1980s and 2000s
【24h】

The Impact of Global Economic Crises on the Poor: Comparing the 1980s and 2000s

机译:全球经济危机对穷人的影响:1980年代和2000年代的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper contrasts the impact of the financial crisis of 2008 on poor countries and poor people with the debt crisis of the 1980s. The financial crisis of the 2000S affected more regions of the world but its effects on particular countries were more heterogeneous, varying according to countries' dependence on different sources of foreign exchange. The worst affected regions were South and Eastern Europe and Latin America. Because of heavy aid dependence and less integration with financial markets, sub-Saharan Africa was less badly affected, while in the 1980s sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America suffered most. In aggregate terms, the fall in gross domestic product (GDP) was much greater in the 2000s than the 1980s. Yet, taken as a whole, the impact on poverty appears to have been less. One major difference between the 1980s and 2000s was the greater autonomy countries had in policy-making, and lesser dependence on the International Monetary Fund, allowing countries to follow more expansionary policies. Government expenditure as a proportion of GDP was generally sustained in 2000s in contrast to severe cuts in the 1980s. Moreover, there were more extensive social support programmes in existence in the 2000s that acted as mild protections against economic downturn. Like the 1980s, there were no real-time data for poverty in 2008 and 2009 at a global level. Global estimates based on simulations show a slowdown in poverty reduction and no increase in actual poverty rates, yet the limited ‘actual’ data reviewed here show an increase in the rate of income poverty, some with social protection programmes in many places, although mostly the increase was more modest than the 1980s. The crisis of 2000s was shorter than the 1980s, so that people and governments could draw on their savings to protect their livelihoods, but if the global recession recurs, the poverty consequences could become much worse. The need for short-term indicators of poverty remains urgent, if we are to be able to analyse the effects of crises on poverty (natural disasters and conflict as well as economic fluctuations) rapidly and accurately, and to design appropriate protective policies.View full textDownload full textKeywordsPoverty, Adjustment, Financial crisisRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2011.637386
机译:本文将2008年金融危机对贫困国家和穷人的影响与1980年代的债务危机进行了对比。 2000年代的金融危机影响了世界上更多地区,但其对特定国家的影响更为不同,具体取决于各国对不同外汇来源的依赖程度。受灾最严重的地区是南欧,东欧和拉丁美洲。由于严重依赖援助和与金融市场的融合较少,因此撒哈拉以南非洲受到的影响较小,而在1980年代,撒哈拉以南非洲和拉丁美洲遭受的影响最大。总体而言,2000年代的国内生产总值(GDP)下降幅度要比1980年代大得多。但是,从总体上看,对贫困的影响似乎较小。 1980年代和2000年代之间的一个主要区别是,各国在决策方面拥有更大的自主权,而对国际货币基金组织的依赖则减少了,从而使各国能够采取更多的扩张性政策。与1980年代的大幅削减相比,2000年代政府支出占GDP的比例总体上维持不变。此外,在2000年代,存在着更广泛的社会支持计划,这些计划为抵御经济衰退提供了温和的保护。与1980年代一样,2008年和2009年全球都没有实时的贫困数据。根据模拟进行的全球估算显示,减贫速度放慢,实际贫困率没有增加,但是这里回顾的有限的“实际”数据显示,收入贫困率增加了,其中有些地方已经实施了社会保护计划,尽管大多数情况下增加的幅度比1980年代要小。 2000年代的危机比1980年代短,因此人民和政府可以动用储蓄来保护他们的生计,但是如果全球经济衰退再次发生,贫困后果将变得更加严重。如果我们能够迅速,准确地分析危机对贫困的影响(自然灾害和冲突以及经济波动),并制定适当的保护政策,那么仍然需要短期贫困指标。文字下载全文关键字贫困,调整,金融危机相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid: ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2011.637386

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号