首页> 外文期刊>Journal of heritage tourism >Leisure and death: an anthropological tour of risk, death, and dying
【24h】

Leisure and death: an anthropological tour of risk, death, and dying

机译:休闲与死亡:风险,死亡与垂死的人类学之旅

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This is clearly an academic text that is aimed primarily at researchers and research students. What is possibly a little less clear is what type of researchers it is aimed at. Is it aimed at those involved with leisure studies, is it aimed at anthropologists, or is it aimed somewhere in between? I will say immediately that while I may not be entirely sure what kind of researcher I am, I am sure I am not an anthropologist. Rather, if I am most closely aligned with anything it is leisure studies. So, it is from this position that I have primarily reviewed Leisure and death and I freely admit that anthropologists may have a different take on the book. Reading this book has actually been a nice reminder for me of the limitations of cross-disciplinarity (even accounting for the fact that leisure studies is a multi-disciplinary meeting ground rather than a discipline in its own right). There are clearly times when there is nothing wrong with difference and we should not rush to remove those just for the sake of working across disciplines.
机译:这显然是一本学术论文,主要针对研究人员和研究学生。可能不太清楚的是它针对的是哪种类型的研究人员。它是针对那些从事休闲研究的人,还是针对人类学家,还是针对两者之间的某个地方?我将立即说,虽然我可能无法完全确定自己是什么样的研究人员,但我肯定我不是人类学家。相反,如果我与任何事物最紧密地结合在一起,那就是休闲学习。因此,正是从这一立场出发,我主要回顾了《休闲与死亡》,我自由地承认人类学家对这本书的看法可能有所不同。读这本书实际上使我想起了跨学科的局限性(甚至考虑到休闲研究是一个多学科的交汇地,而不是一门学科)。显然,有时没有什么不妥的区别,我们不应该为了跨学科的工作而匆忙删除它们。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of heritage tourism》 |2019年第4期|387-388|共2页
  • 作者

    Neil Carr;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Tourism, University ofOtago, Dunedin, New Zealand;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:17:04

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号