首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Health Services Research & Policy >Guidelines and educational outreach visits from community pharmacists to improve prescribing in general practice: a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Guidelines and educational outreach visits from community pharmacists to improve prescribing in general practice: a randomised controlled trial

机译:社区药剂师的指南和教育外访,以改善一般实践中的处方:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of guidelines with or without one-to-one educational outreach visits byncommunity pharmacists in improving general practice prescribing for non-steroidal anti-in ammatory drugsn(NSAIDs).nMethods: Cluster randomised trial of 20 general practices within Avon, England. Practices were randomised tonthree groups: control; mailed guidelines; mailed guidelines plus educational outreach visits. General practitionersn(GPs) in the latter group received two one-to-one outreach visits from community pharmacists. Changes innprescribing were measured using outcomes derived from prescribing analysis and cost (PACT) data. The primarynoutcome measure was change in the volume of prescribing for ibuprofen, diclofenac and naproxen as a percentagenof total NSAID prescribing. Six secondary outcomes included other measures of prescribing quality and volume. Ancost–bene. t analysis was performed.nResults: No signi. cant differences were observed for the primary outcome measure: practices receiving outreachnvisits prescribed only 2.1% [95% con. dence interval (CI): ¡0.8 to 5.0] more of the three recommended NSAIDsnthan the control practices did and 1.6% (95% CI: ¡1.4 to 4.7) more than practices that received guidelines only.nFollowing adjustment for multiple comparisons, only one secondary outcome showed a statistically signi. cantndifference between the groups: the proportion of prescribing of the . ve most frequently used drugs was 2.2% (95%nCI: 0.9 to 3.6) higher in the educational outreach group compared with the control group. A net increase in costs wasnshown with both interventions.nConclusions: Although good prescribing at baseline in the participating practices limited the capacity fornimprovement, this trial provides no evidence that guidelines with or without educational outreach visits fromncommunity pharmacists lead to substantial improvements in prescribing behaviour.
机译:目的:评估社区药师在进行或不进行一对一的教育外访的情况下,改善非甾体类抗炎药处方的临床实践的有效性。n方法:在20种常规实践中进行集群随机试验英格兰雅芳。实践被随机分为三组:对照组;对照组;对照组。邮寄指南;邮寄的指南以及教育外展访问。后者中的全科医生(GPs)接受了社区药剂师的两次一对一外展访问。使用从处方分析和成本(PACT)数据得出的结果来衡量处方的变化。主要的预后指标是布洛芬,双氯芬酸和萘普生的处方量占总NSAID处方量的百分比。六个次要结果包括其他规定质量和数量的指标。 Ancost-Bene。 t分析被执行。n结果:无显着性。观察到的主要结果指标差异不大:接受外联访问的行为仅规定了2.1%[95%con。 Dence区间(CI):建议的三种NSAID值要比对照实践高出[0.8至5.0],比仅接受指导的实践高出1.6%(95%CI:≤1.4至4.7)。n在进行多次比较调整后,只有一项次要结果显示有统计学意义。小组之间的差异:处方的比例。与对照组相比,教育外展组中最常用的药物增加了2.2%(95%nCI:0.9至3.6)。两种干预措施均未显示出费用的净增加。n结论:尽管参与实践中基线的良好处方限制了改进的能力,但该试验没有提供证据表明有或没有社区药师进行教育外访的指导原则可大大改善处方行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号