首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of General Practice >A randomised controlled trial of the effect of educational outreach by community pharmacists on prescribing in UK general practice.
【2h】

A randomised controlled trial of the effect of educational outreach by community pharmacists on prescribing in UK general practice.

机译:社区药剂师进行的教育推广对英国全科医师开处方的影响的随机对照试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Educational outreach visits are commonly used to promote changes in prescribing in family practice. However, the effectiveness of outreach visits has not been evaluated across a range of settings. AIM: To estimate the effectiveness of educational outreach visits on United Kingdom (UK) general practice prescribing and to examine the extent to which practice characteristics influenced outcome. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: General practices in 12 health authorities in England. METHOD: Educational outreach visits were made to practices that received two of four guidelines. Each practice provided data on treatment of patients for all four guidelines for both pre and post-intervention periods. The primary outcome is average effect across all four guidelines. Secondary analyses examined the predictive effect of practice and guideline characteristics. RESULTS: Seventy per cent of practices approached agreed to take part in the intervention. Overall, educational outreach was associated with a significant improvement in prescribing practice (odds ratio [OR] = 1.24 [95% CI = 1.07 to 1.42]), a 5.2% (95% CI = 1.7% to 8.7%) increase in the number of patients treated within the guideline recommendations. Smaller practices (two or fewer full-time equivalent practitioners) responded much more favourably to educational outreach than larger practices. Smaller practices improved their performance in line with the guidelines by 13.5% (95% CI = 6% to 20.9%) attributable to outreach, while larger practices improved by only 1.4% (95% CI = -2.4% to 5.3%, P-value for interaction <0.001). CONCLUSION: In large practices, educational outreach alone is unlikely to achieve worthwhile change. There is good evidence to support the use of educational outreach visits in small practices.
机译:背景:教育外展访问通常用于促进家庭实践处方的改变。但是,尚未在一系列设置中评估外展访问的有效性。目的:评估联合王国(UK)一般实践处方教育外展访问的有效性,并研究实践特征影响结果的程度。研究设计:随机对照试验。地点:英格兰12个卫生部门的一般做法。方法:对接受了四个指南中的两个指南的实践进行了教育外展访问。每种实践都提供了干预前后所有四个指南的患者治疗数据。主要结果是所有四个指南的平均效果。次要分析检查了实践和指南特征的预测效果。结果:所采取的做法中有70%同意参加干预措施。总体而言,教育推广与处方实践的显着改善相关(赔率[OR] = 1.24 [95%CI = 1.07至1.42]),数字增加了5.2%(95%CI = 1.7%至8.7%)指南推荐范围内接受治疗的患者数。较小的做法(两个或更少的全职等效从业人员)对教育推广的反应要比较大的做法好得多。较小的做法将其效果提高了13.5%(95%CI = 6%至20.9%),与指南相符,而大型做法则仅改善了1.4%(95%CI = -2.4%至5.3%,P-互动值<0.001)。结论:在大型实践中,仅靠教育就不可能实现值得的改变。有充分的证据支持在小型实践中使用教育外展访问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号