...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health economics >Pricing of drugs with heterogeneous health insurance coverage
【24h】

Pricing of drugs with heterogeneous health insurance coverage

机译:具有不同健康保险范围的药物的定价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, we examine the role of insurance coverage in explaining the generic competition paradox in a two-stage game involving a single producer of brand-name drugs and n quantity-competing producers of generic drugs. Independently of brand loyalty, which some studies rely upon to explain the paradox, we show that heterogeneity in insurance coverage may result in higher prices of brand-name drugs following generic entry. With market segmentation based on insurance coverage present in both the pre- and post-entry stages, the paradox can arise when the two types of drugs are highly substitutable and the market is quite profitable but does not have to arise when the two types of drugs are highly differentiated. However, with market segmentation occurring only after generic entry, the paradox can arise when the two types of drugs are weakly substitutable, provided, however, that the industry is not very profitable. In both cases, that is, when market segmentation is present in the pre-entry stage and when it is not, the paradox becomes more likely to arise as the market expands and/or insurance companies decrease deductibles applied on the purchase of generic drugs.
机译:在本文中,我们考察了保险覆盖率在解释两阶段博弈中的仿制药竞争悖论中的作用,该博弈涉及单个品牌药生产商和数量竞争的仿制药生产商。独立于品牌忠诚度(一些研究依靠这一点来解释这一悖论),我们表明,保险范围内的异质性可能会导致仿制药进入后品牌药价格上涨。由于在进入前和进入后阶段都存在基于保险范围的市场细分,因此当两种药物具有高度可替代性且市场相当有利可图时就可能出现悖论,而当两种药物却不必出现时高度差异化。但是,由于市场细分仅在仿制药进入市场后发生,因此,如果该行业的获利不是很高,则当两种药物的替代性很弱时,就会出现悖论。在这两种情况下,即在进入前阶段存在市场细分时,以及在没有进入细分市场时,随着市场的扩大和/或保险公司减少在购买仿制药时使用的免赔额,这种悖论更有可能出现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号