首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health economics >The moral hazard effects of consumer responses to targeted cost-sharing
【24h】

The moral hazard effects of consumer responses to targeted cost-sharing

机译:消费者对有针对性的成本分摊反应的道德风险影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines the effects of the reference pricing program implemented by the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) in 2012. The program uses targeted cost-sharing to incentivize patient price shopping. We find that the program leads to a 10.3% increase in the use of low-price providers and reduces the average cost per procedure by 12.5%. We further estimate that the program reduces medical spending by $218.8 per procedure, which we estimate is approximately 53.7% of the excessive spending that is due to patient choice of higher price providers caused by insurance coverage, at the expense of a $94.3 (or 12.5%) reduction in consumer surplus. The cost savings from the reference pricing program is about two to three times as large as the reduction from implementing a high-deductible health plan, while the accompanying consumer surplus reduction is much smaller under reference pricing. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文研究了加州公共雇员退休系统(CalPERS)在2012年实施的参考定价计划的效果。该计划使用目标成本分摊来激励患者购买价格。我们发现,该计划使低价提供者的使用增加了10.3%,并使每个过程的平均成本降低了12.5%。我们进一步估计,该计划将每个程序的医疗支出减少了218.8美元,我们估计这是因保险选择导致患者选择更高价格的医疗服务提供商而导致的超额支出的53.7%,费用为94.3美元(或12.5%) )减少消费者剩余。参考定价计划节省的成本大约是实施高扣除额健康计划所减少的成本的两到三倍,而在参考定价下,伴随的消费者剩余减少量则要小得多。 (c)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号