首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hazardous Materials >Evaluation of two portable lead-monitoring methods at mining sites
【24h】

Evaluation of two portable lead-monitoring methods at mining sites

机译:评估矿场中两种便携式铅监测方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two methods for measuring airborne lead using field-portable instruments have been developed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Method 7702 uses X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and Method 7701 employs ultrasonic extraction (UE) followed by anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV). The two portable methods were evaluated at mining sites. Area air samples were collected throughout two mills where ore from nearby mines was processed; the primary constituent of the ore was lead sulfide (galena). The air samples were collected on 37 mm mixed cellulose ester membrane filters housed within plastic filter cassettes. At the end of the work shift, the cassettes were collected and taken to a room off-site for analysis by the two portable methods. The filter samples were first analyzed by XRF and then by UE/ASV. Calibration was verified on both instruments according to standard procedures. The samples were then sent for confirmatory analysis via flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) according to NIOSH Method 7082. Pairwise comparisons between the methods using the paired t-test showed no statistically significant differences between ASV and FAAS (P > 0.05); however, the comparison between XRF and FAAS was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The elevated lead concentrations reported by XRF relative to FAAS were likely the result of the ability of XRF to report total lead, including lead silicates. This form of lead is not liberated in the digestion process prior to FAAS analysis, and is therefore not detected by this method. Despite this discrepancy, lead concentrations measured by both portable technologies were found to be highly correlated with the laboratory method (R~2 > 0.96), suggesting that they are suitable as screening methods for airborne lead at mining sites.
机译:美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)已开发出两种使用现场便携式仪器测量空气中铅的方法:方法7702使用X射线荧光(XRF),方法7701使用超声提取(UE)然后采用阳极溶出伏安法(ASV)。在采矿现场对这两种便携式方法进行了评估。在两个工厂中收集了附近矿场矿石的区域空气样本。矿石的主要成分是硫化铅(方铅矿)。空气样品收集在塑料滤盒内的37毫米混合纤维素酯膜滤器上。轮班结束时,将盒式磁带收集起来并带到异地房间,通过两种便携式方法进行分析。过滤器样本首先通过XRF分析,然后通过UE / ASV分析。根据标准程序在两台仪器上验证了校准。然后根据NIOSH方法7082,通过火焰原子吸收光谱法(FAAS)将样品送去进行确认分析。使用配对t检验的方法之间的成对比较显示,ASV和FAAS之间没有统计学上的显着差异(P> 0.05)。然而,XRF和FAAS之间的比较具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。 XRF报告的铅浓度相对于FAAS升高,可能是XRF报告包括铅硅酸盐在内的总铅的能力的结果。这种形式的铅在FAAS分析之前的消化过程中不会释放出来,因此无法通过这种方法检测到。尽管存在这种差异,但发现两种便携式技术测量的铅浓度都与实验室方法高度相关(R〜2> 0.96),这表明它们适合作为采矿现场空气中铅的筛选方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号