...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hazardous Materials >Safety distance assessment of industrial toxic releases based on frequency and consequence: A case study in Shanghai, China
【24h】

Safety distance assessment of industrial toxic releases based on frequency and consequence: A case study in Shanghai, China

机译:基于频率和后果的工业毒物排放安全距离评估:以中国上海为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A case study on the safety distance assessment of a chemical industry park in Shanghai, China, is presented in this paper. Toxic releases were taken into consideration. A safety criterion based on frequency and consequence of major hazard accidents was set up for consequence analysis. The exposure limits for the accidents with the frequency of more than 10~(-4),10~(-5)-10~(-4) and 10~(-6)-10~(-5) per year were mortalities of 1% (or SLOT), 50% (SLOD) and 75% (twice of SLOD) respectively. Accidents with the frequency of less than 10~(-6) per year were considered incredible and ignored in the consequence analysis. Taking the safety distance of all the hazard installations in a chemical plant into consideration, the results based on the new criterion were almost smaller than those based on LC50 or SLOD. The combination of the consequence and risk based results indicated that the hazard installations in two of the chemical plants may be dangerous to the protection targets and measurements had to be taken to reduce the risk. The case study showed that taking account of the frequency of occurrence in the consequence analysis would give more feasible safety distances for major hazard accidents and the results were more comparable to those calculated by risk assessment.
机译:本文以上海某化工园区安全距离评估为例。考虑到有毒物质的释放。建立了基于重大危险事故发生频率和后果的安全标准,用于后果分析。每年发生频率超过10〜(-4),10〜(-5)-10〜(-4)和10〜(-6)-10〜(-5)的事故的暴露极限是死亡率分别为1%(或插槽),50%(SLOD)和75%(SLOD的两倍)。每年发生频率低于10〜(-6)的事故被认为是不可思议的,在后果分析中被忽略。考虑到化工厂中所有危险设施的安全距离,基于新标准的结果几乎小于基于LC50或SLOD的结果。结果和基于风险的结果的组合表明,两个化工厂中的危险设施可能会对保护目标造成危险,因此必须采取措施以降低风险。案例研究表明,在后果分析中考虑发生频率将为重大危险事故提供更可行的安全距离,并且结果与通过风险评估计算得出的结果更具可比性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Hazardous Materials 》 |2009年第3期| 955-961| 共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, 220 Handan Road, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China;

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, 220 Handan Road, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China;

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, 220 Handan Road, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China;

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, 220 Handan Road, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China;

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, 220 Handan Road, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    safety distance; safety criterion; toxic release; major hazard accidents;

    机译:安全距离安全标准;有毒释放重大危险事故;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号