首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Global Optimization >Influence of ensemble surrogate models and sampling strategy on the solution quality of algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problems
【24h】

Influence of ensemble surrogate models and sampling strategy on the solution quality of algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problems

机译:集成替代模型和采样策略对计算量大的黑箱全局优化问题算法求解质量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines the influence of two major aspects on the solution quality of surrogate model algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problems, namely the surrogate model choice and the method of iteratively selecting sample points. A random sampling strategy (algorithm SO-M-c) and a strategy where the minimum point of the response surface is used as new sample point (algorithm SO-M-s) are compared in numerical experiments. Various surrogate models and their combinations have been used within the SO-M-c and SO-M-s sampling frameworks. The Dempster-Shafer Theory approach used in the algorithm by Mueller and Piche (J Glob Optim 51:79-104, 2011) has been used for combining the surrogate models. The algorithms are numerically compared on 13 deterministic literature test problems with 2-30 dimensions, an application problem that deals with groundwater bioremediation, and an application that arises in energy generation using tethered kites. NOMAD and the particle swarm pattern search algorithm (PSWARM), which are derivative-free optimization methods, have been included in the comparison. The algorithms have also been compared to a kriging method that uses the expected improvement as sampling strategy (FEI), which is similar to the Efficient Global Optimization (EGO) algorithm. Data and performance profiles show that surrogate model combinations containing the cubic radial basis function (RBF) model work best regardless of the sampling strategy, whereas using only a polynomial regression model should be avoided. Kriging and combinations including kriging perform in general worse than when RBF models are used. NOMAD, PSWARM, and FEI perform for most problems worse than SO-M-s and SO-M-c. Within the scope of this study a Matlab toolbox has been developed that allows the user to choose, among others, between various sampling strategies and surrogate models and their combinations. The open source toolbox is available from the authors upon request.
机译:本文考察了代理模型选择和迭代选择样本点的方法这两个主要方面对代理模型算法的求解质量的影响,这些模型算法在计算上耗费大量黑盒全局优化问题。在数值实验中,比较了随机采样策略(算法SO-M-c)和将响应面的最小点用作新采样点的策略(算法SO-M-s)。在SO-M-c和SO-M-s抽样框架内使用了各种替代模型及其组合。 Mueller和Piche(J Glob Optim 51:79-104,2011)算法中使用的Dempster-Shafer理论方法已用于组合替代模型。该算法在2个至30个维度的13个确定性文献测试问题,涉及地下水生物修复的应用问题以及使用束缚风筝产生能量的应用中进行了数值比较。比较中包括无导数优化方法NOMAD和粒子群模式搜索算法(PSWARM)。还将该算法与使用预期改进的抽样策略(FEI)的克里金法进行了比较,该方法类似于有效全局优化(EGO)算法。数据和性能概况表明,无论采样策略如何,包含三次径向基函数(RBF)模型的替代模型组合都效果最好,而应避免仅使用多项式回归模型。克里金法和包括克里金法的组合通常比使用RBF模型时表现差。在大多数问题上,NOMAD,PSWARM和FEI的表现都比SO-M-s和SO-M-c差。在本研究的范围内,已经开发了Matlab工具箱,该工具箱使用户可以在各种采样策略,替代模型及其组合之间进行选择。开源工具箱可应要求从作者那里获得。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号