...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering >Slope Stabilizing Piles and Pile-Groups: Parametric Study and Design Insights
【24h】

Slope Stabilizing Piles and Pile-Groups: Parametric Study and Design Insights

机译:边坡稳定桩和桩组:参数研究和设计见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper uses a hybrid method for analysis and design of slope stabilizing piles that was developed in a preceding paper by the writers. The aim of this paper is to derive insights about the factors influencing the response of piles and pile-groups. Axis-to-axis pile spacing (S), thickness of stable soil mass (H_u), depth (L_e) of pile embedment, pile diameter (D), and pile group configuration are the parameters addressed in the study. It is shown that S = AD is the most cost-effective pile spacing, because it is the largest spacing that can still generate soil arching between the piles. Soil inhomogeneity (in terms of shear stiffness) was found to be unimportant, because the response is primarily affected by the strength of the unstable soil layer. For relatively small pile embedments, pile response is dominated by rigid-body rotation without substantial flexural distortion: the short pile mode of failure. In these cases, the structural capacity of the pile cannot be exploited, and the design will not be economical. The critical embedment depth to achieve fixity conditions at the base of the pile is found to range from 0.7H_u to 1.5H_u, depending on the relative strength of the unstable ground compared to that of the stable ground (i.e., the soil below the sliding plane). An example of dimensionless design charts is presented for piles embedded in rock. Results are presented for two characteristic slenderness ratios and several pile spacings. Single piles are concluded to be generally inadequate for stabilizing deep landslides, although capped pile-groups invoking framing action may offer an efficient solution.
机译:本文使用由作者在前一篇论文中提出的混合方法来分析和设计边坡稳定桩。本文的目的是获得有关影响桩和桩群响应的因素的见解。研究中涉及的参数有轴对轴间距(S),稳定土体厚度(H_u),桩埋深(L_e),桩直径(D)和桩组配置。结果表明,S = AD是最具成本效益的桩间距,因为它是仍然可以在桩之间产生土拱的最大间距。发现土壤不均匀性(就剪切刚度而言)并不重要,因为响应主要受不稳定土壤层强度的影响。对于相对较小的桩嵌入,桩响应主要由刚体旋转决定,而没有明显的挠曲变形:短桩破坏模式。在这些情况下,无法利用桩的结构能力,并且设计将不经济。发现在桩基处达到固定条件的临界埋深范围为0.7H_u至1.5H_u,具体取决于不稳定地面与稳定地面(即,滑动面以下的土壤)的相对强度)。给出了嵌入岩石中的无量纲设计图表的示例。给出了两个特征细长比和几个桩间距的结果。结论是,单桩通常不足以稳定深层滑坡,尽管有盖桩组调用框架作用可能会提供有效的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号