首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering >Arching and Deformation in a Piled Embankment: Centrifuge Tests Compared to Analytical Calculations
【24h】

Arching and Deformation in a Piled Embankment: Centrifuge Tests Compared to Analytical Calculations

机译:桩基路堤的拱形和变形:离心测试与分析计算的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Measured loads in centrifuge tests on piled embankments were compared with values calculated by three analytical arching models. The Zaeske and Van Eekelen models use sets of arches that give the direction of the load transfer, and result in an increasing load on the soft soil with increasing embankment thickness or surcharge load, which matches the measurements. The Svano model, however, assumes that the load on the soft soil remains constant with increasing embankment thickness or surcharge load, thereby being transferred directly to the piles. Therefore, the Zaeske and Van Eekelen models match the measurements better than the Svano model. The Van Eekelen model slightly overestimates the pile efficiency for relatively thin embankments, but matches the measurements better than the Zaeske model for increasing embankment thickness or surcharge load.
机译:将在堆积路堤上进行的离心测试中测得的载荷与通过三个分析拱形模型计算出的值进行比较。 Zaeske和Van Eekelen模型使用一组拱形结构,这些拱形结构给出了荷载传递的方向,并随着路堤厚度或附加荷载的增加,使软土上的荷载增加,这与测量结果相符。但是,Svano模型假设,随着路堤厚度或附加荷载的增加,软土上的荷载保持恒定,从而直接传递到桩上。因此,Zaeske和Van Eekelen模型比Svano模型更好地匹配了测量结果。 Van Eekelen模型稍微高估了相对较薄路堤的桩效率,但在增加路堤厚度或附加荷载方面,与Zaeske模型更好地匹配了测量结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号