首页> 外文OA文献 >European analytical calculations compared with a full-scale Brazilian piled embankment
【2h】

European analytical calculations compared with a full-scale Brazilian piled embankment

机译:欧洲分析计算与全尺寸巴西桩路堤相比较

摘要

Measurements have been carried out in a full-scale Brazilian basal reinforced piled embankment. The subsoil beneath the geosynthetic reinforcement (GR) had been excavated before the installation of the reinforced embankment. The embankment was relatively thin in comparison to the pile cap spacing, resulting in relative much load on the GR. GR strains and settlements have been measured making it possible to validate analytical models. Many analytical design models for the design of piled embankments distinguish two calculation steps; calculation step 1; the arching and calculation step 2 ; the load deflection behaviour of the GR. This papser presents the comparison of the full-scale test with a new step 1 - model ; the Concentric arches model (Van Eekelen et al. 2013) and several step 2 models. The new concentric arches model is an extension on the models of Hewlet and Randolph (1988) and Zaeske (2001) and takes into account the 3D nature of the arching. The new model was developed because experiments had showed a load distribution on the GR in a piled embankment that could not be explained with the existing models. The new model does explain the measured load distribution.
机译:已经在巴西全尺寸的基础加固桩路堤中进行了测量。在安装加筋路堤之前,已经挖掘了土工合成材料加筋层(GR)下的地下土壤。与桩帽间距相比,路堤相对较薄,从而导致GR承受相对较大的载荷。已经测量了GR应变和沉降,从而有可能验证分析模型。用于桩基路堤设计的许多分析设计模型都区分两个计算步骤。计算步骤1;拱形计算步骤2; GR的载荷挠度行为。这篇论文介绍了全面测试与新的第一步模型的比较;同心拱模型(Van Eekelen et al。2013)和多个第2步模型。新的同心拱模型是Hewlet和Randolph(1988)和Zaeske(2001)模型的扩展,并考虑了拱的3D性质。之所以开发新模型,是因为实验表明,桩基路堤上GR的载荷分布无法用现有模型进行解释。新模型的确说明了测得的载荷分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号