首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geographical Systems >Hedonic approaches based on spatial econometrics and spatial statistics: application to evaluation of project benefits
【24h】

Hedonic approaches based on spatial econometrics and spatial statistics: application to evaluation of project benefits

机译:基于空间计量经济学和空间统计的享乐主义方法:在项目效益评估中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study discusses the theoretical foundation of the application of spatial hedonic approaches—the hedonic approach employing spatial econometrics or/and spatial statistics—to benefits evaluation. The study highlights the limitations of the spatial econometrics approach since it uses a spatial weight matrix that is not employed by the spatial statistics approach. Further, the study presents empirical analyses by applying the Spatial Autoregressive Error Model (SAEM), which is based on the spatial econometrics approach, and the Spatial Process Model (SPM), which is based on the spatial statistics approach. SPMs are conducted based on both isotropy and anisotropy and applied to different mesh sizes. The empirical analysis reveals that the estimated benefits are quite different, especially between isotropic and anisotropic SPM and between isotropic SPM and SAEM; the estimated benefits are similar for SAEM and anisotropic SPM. The study demonstrates that the mesh size does not affect the estimated amount of benefits. Finally, the study provides a confidence interval for the estimated benefits and raises an issue with regard to benefit evaluation.
机译:这项研究讨论了将空间享乐主义方法(享乐主义方法采用空间计量经济学或/和空间统计学)应用于利益评估的理论基础。该研究强调了空间计量经济学方法的局限性,因为它使用了空间统计方法未采用的空间权重矩阵。此外,该研究还通过应用基于空间计量经济学方法的空间自回归误差模型(SAEM)和基于空间统计方法的空间过程模型(SPM)进行了实证分析。 SPM基于各向同性和各向异性进行,并应用于不同的网格尺寸。实证分析表明,估计的收益有很大不同,特别是各向同性和各向异性SPM之间以及各向同性SPM和SAEM之间; SAEM和各向异性SPM的估计收益相似。该研究表明,筛孔尺寸不会影响估计的收益。最后,该研究为估计的收益提供了一个置信区间,并提出了有关收益评估的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号