...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery >Self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency resection for obstructing left-sided colorectal cancer: A case-matched study
【24h】

Self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency resection for obstructing left-sided colorectal cancer: A case-matched study

机译:自扩张式金属支架可作为阻塞左侧结直肠癌的手术与紧急切除术的桥梁:一项病例匹配研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients who suffered from obstructing left-sided colorectal cancer, treated with self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery, with those who underwent emergency operation. Twenty patients who had acute obstruction due to left-sided colorectal cancer underwent surgical resection after insertion of SEMS (group I) were matched to 40 patients with emergency colonic resection (group II). The two groups were compared for the incidence of primary anastomosis, stoma rate, hospital stay, duration of intensive care, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. Both groups had similar preoperative comorbidity and stage of disease, but the tumors in group I were more distally located (P<0.001). In group I, one patient developed colon perforation and required Hartmann’s operation. All the other patients underwent elective operation with primary anastomosis. In group II, primary anastomosis was performed in 29 patients (72.5%; P=0.047). The operative mortality of group I and group II was 5% and 12.5%, respectively (P=0.653). Significantly shorter median postoperative hospital stay and median stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) were observed in group I (9 days [range, 5–39 days] vs. 12 days [range, 8–49 days], P=0.015 and 0 day [range, 0–17 days] vs. 0.5 day [range, 0–18 days], P=0.022, respectively). There were no differences in hospital mortality (P=0.653) or 30-day mortality (P=0.653). Both groups had similar reoperation rates, surgical complications, and medical complications. When compared with emergency resection, insertion of SEMS as a bridge to surgery for obstructing left-sided colorectal cancer is associated with a higher rate of primary anastomosis as well as a better outcome in terms of hospital stay and stay in the ICU. The wider application of this treatment option for obstructing colorectal cancer warranted further studies.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较接受自扩张金属支架(SEMS)作为外科手术桥梁的阻塞性左结直肠癌患者与接受紧急手术的患者的结局。插入SEMS后,有20例因左侧结直肠癌导致急性梗阻的患者接受了手术切除(I组),与40例急诊结肠切除的患者(II组)相匹配。比较两组的原发性吻合的发生率,造口率,住院时间,重症监护时间,术后发病率和死亡率。两组术前合并症和疾病分期相似,但第一组肿瘤位于远端(P <0.001)。在第一组中,一名患者出现了结肠穿孔,需要进行Hartmann手术。所有其他患者均接受了原发性吻合术的选择性手术。在第二组中,有29例患者进行了原发性吻合术(72.5%; P = 0.047)。 I组和II组的手术死亡率分别为5%和12.5%(P = 0.653)。在第一组中,观察到的中位术后住院时间和重症监护病房(ICU)的中位时间明显缩短(9天[5-39天],而12天[8-49天],P = 0.015和0天[范围0-17天]与0.5天[范围0-18天],P = 0.022)。住院死亡率(P = 0.653)或30天死亡率(P = 0.653)没有差异。两组的再手术率,手术并发症和医疗并发症相似。与紧急切除相比,将SEMS插入作为阻塞左侧结直肠癌手术的桥梁与原发吻合率更高,以及住院和留在ICU的预后更好有关。该治疗方案在阻塞大肠癌中的广泛应用值得进一步研究。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 》 |2006年第6期| 798-803| 共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Surgery University of Hong Kong Medical Centre Queen Mary Hospital Pokfulam Road Hong Kong;

    Department of Surgery University of Hong Kong Medical Centre Queen Mary Hospital Pokfulam Road Hong Kong;

    Department of Surgery University of Hong Kong Medical Centre Queen Mary Hospital Pokfulam Road Hong Kong;

    Department of Surgery University of Hong Kong Medical Centre Queen Mary Hospital Pokfulam Road Hong Kong;

    Department of Surgery University of Hong Kong Medical Centre Queen Mary Hospital Pokfulam Road Hong Kong;

    Department of Surgery University of Hong Kong Medical Centre Queen Mary Hospital Pokfulam Road Hong Kong;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Colorectal cancer; metallic stent;

    机译:大肠癌;金属支架;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号