This article provides a citation analysis of Lave and Wengerâs work on âcommunities of practiceâ and âsituated learningâ over the period 1991-2001. The data relate to educational research in the UK, although comparisons are made with the USA. The findings indicate that although the text was incorporated and heavily used within educational research over the period of the study there were very few citations that could be identified as cumulative. The discussion considers the value of using citations as an indicator of quality within any research excellence framework and argues the case for taking a broader, more qualitative approach to assessing research quality in the social sciences.View full textDownload full textKeywordseducational research, citation analysis, Lave and WengerRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098771003695924
展开▼
机译：本文提供了对Lave和Wenger在1991-2001年间有关“实践社区”和“现场学习”的工作的引文分析。尽管与美国进行了比较，但这些数据与英国的教育研究有关。调查结果表明，尽管在研究期间该文本已被并入教育研究，并在教育研究中大量使用，但很少有文献被认为是累积性的。讨论考虑了在任何卓越研究框架内使用引文作为质量指标的价值，并提出了采用更广泛，更定性的方法来评估社会科学研究质量的理由。查看全文下载全文关键字教育研究，引文分析，拉夫和WengerRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098771003695924
展开▼
