首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Further and Higher Education >The case for mixed methodologies in researching the teacher’s use of humour in adult education
【24h】

The case for mixed methodologies in researching the teacher’s use of humour in adult education

机译:研究教师在成人教育中使用幽默的混合方法论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Inconsistencies within the literature result in teachers not having sufficient guidance to develop their humour use in support of learning without risking their professionalism. This article argues for more comprehensive evidence to guide teachers’ use of humour, based on mixed methodological approaches. The case is also made for the Interpersonal Communication Competence Model (ICCM) to be used as a consistent theoretical framework when researching teachers’ use of humour. A methodological literature review design is deployed to explore the conceptualisation, methodologies and situational factors within the selected research. The selected research is analysed in accordance with the ICCM’s five key concepts of motivation, knowledge, skills, outcomes and context. Comparisons are made against a depiction of humour based on the ICCM. The analysis reveals a diversity of conceptualisations of humour and different situational factors influencing teachers’ use of humour, and shows that findings conflict with ‘competent communication’. No research studies linked the various influencing factors together to provide all-embracing guidance for teachers. Studies based on mono-methodologies using qualitative or quantitative research designs only appear to provide the teacher with pieces of the jigsaw pertaining to humour use in teaching. Although mixed methodologies have their own design concerns, the author argues that they offer an opportunity to merge multiple situational factors to produce a more accurate representation of humour use within a teaching context. In conclusion, he proposes that future research utilises a mixed methodological approach along with the ICCM to capture supportive and contradictory perspectives of humour use.View full textDownload full textKeywordsteaching, mixed methodology, humourRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.584966
机译:文献中的不一致导致教师没有得到足够的指导以发展他们的幽默用法来支持学习而又没有冒着专业精神的风险。本文提出了基于混合方法论方法的更全面的证据,以指导教师使用幽默。在研究教师对幽默的使用时,人际交往能力模型(ICCM)也可以用作一致的理论框架。部署了方法学文献综述设计,以探索所选研究中的概念,方法论和情境因素。根据ICCM的五个主要动机,知识,技能,成果和背景的关键概念对选定的研究进行了分析。根据ICCM对幽默描述进行比较。分析揭示了幽默的概念化和影响教师使用幽默的不同情境因素,并表明发现与“胜任沟通”相冲突。没有研究将各种影响因素联系在一起,以为教师提供全方位的指导。使用定性或定量研究设计的基于单方法的研究似乎只能为教师提供一些有关幽默在教学中的用法的拼图。尽管混合方法有其自身的设计问题,但作者认为,它们提供了一个机会,可以融合多种情境因素,以在教学环境中更准确地表示幽默使用。总而言之,他建议未来的研究采用一种混合的方法论方法以及ICCM来捕获幽默使用的支持性和矛盾性观点。查看全文下载全文关键词教学,混合方法,humourRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”, services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.584966

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号