首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Further and Higher Education >The barbarians at the gate. Playing the higher education game: observations from the periphery of the field
【24h】

The barbarians at the gate. Playing the higher education game: observations from the periphery of the field

机译:门口的野蛮人。玩高等教育游戏:来自领域外围的观察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Higher education is considered by some to be synonymous with learning gained in an institution named as a university. The credentials gained from learning in such locations allow the holders to enter into the elite, which reproduces social exclusion to the benefit of that elite. In England, policy reform has opened up access to higher education to a level of almost mass participation. This has largely been achieved by funding higher education in colleges. However, following the implementation of this recommendation, a recurring criticism is that such learning is not ‘real’ higher education (HE). This article seeks to examine this notion of ‘real’ HE using Bourdieu’s tools of field, habitus and capital. The questions framing the enquiry are: is the field of higher education populated only by institutions named as universities? Has a new field been created? If the field has changed, has the game of higher education changed as new players have entered the field, or does the traditional doxa still prevail? What are the implications of the field games for institutional habitus and capital? Drawing upon the experiences of a college of further education located in the periphery of the field, the questions posed are considered in this context.View full textDownload full textKeywordsBourdieu, field, habitus, capital, doxa, higher education, HE in FERelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.606899
机译:有人认为高等教育是在名为大学的机构中获得的学习的同义词。在这样的地方学习获得的资格证书使持有人可以进入精英阶层,从而将社会排斥现象复制出来,从而使精英阶层受益。在英格兰,政策改革使高等教育的普及程度达到了几乎大众参与的水平。这在很大程度上是通过为大学的高等教育提供资金来实现的。但是,在实施该建议后,经常出现批评,即这种学习不是“真正的”高等教育(HE)。本文试图使用布迪厄的田野,惯习和资本工具来检验“真实” HE的概念。询问的问题是:高等教育领域是否仅由名为大学的机构填充?是否创建了新字段?如果领域发生了变化,随着新玩家进入该领域,高等教育的游戏是否发生了变化,还是传统的斗仙仍然盛行?实地游戏对机构习惯和资本有什么影响?借鉴位于该领域外围的一所继续教育学院的经验,在此情况下考虑所提出的问题。查看全文下载全文关键字布迪厄,领域,惯性,资本,doxa,高等教育,FE中的HE相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.606899

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号