首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice >Individualizing Risk Assessment: Balancing Idiographic and Nomothetic Data
【24h】

Individualizing Risk Assessment: Balancing Idiographic and Nomothetic Data

机译:个性化风险评估:平衡表意文字和名义数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Forensic mental health professionals are conducting risk assessment evaluations with increasing frequency in a variety of criminal, civil, and family law contexts. Although evaluators can choose from a variety of empirically validated risk assessment tools, there is comparatively little guidance on how data gathered during the evaluation should be utilized in reaching the final risk determination. In particular, research suggests that evaluators find it challenging to balance nomothetic and idiographic data in risk assessment contexts. After highlighting several errors involving the use of nomothetic and idiographic data, we offer guidance for achieving an effective balance between both sources of data.View full textDownload full textKEYWORDSrisk assessment, idiographic, nomothetic, forensic mental health assessmentsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2010.481244
机译:法医精神卫生专业人员正在各种刑法,民法和家庭法背景下,越来越频繁地进行风险评估评估。尽管评估人员可以从各种经过经验验证的风险评估工具中进行选择,但是对于如何利用评估过程中收集的数据来确定最终风险,目前尚缺乏指导。尤其是,研究表明,评估人员发现在风险评估环境中平衡名词数据和专项数据具有挑战性。在强调了涉及使用惯常数据和特殊数据的错误后,我们提供了在两种数据源之间实现有效平衡的指南。 &Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2010.481244

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号