In a recent narrative review and meta-analysis of the criminal profiling (CP) literature, Snook, Eastwood, Gendreau, Goggin, and Cullen (200727. Snook , B. , Eastwood , J. , Gendreau , P. , Goggin , C. and Cullen , R. M. 2007 . Taking stock of criminal profiling: A narrative review and meta-analysis . Criminal Justice and Behavior , 34 : 437 - 453 . [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®]View all references) found that self-labeled profilers and/or self-labeled profilers/experienced detectives did not decisively outperform lay individuals in their ability to produce accurate profiles. Combined with their finding that the CP literature is based largely on commonsense rationales, they cautioned police officers about using CP in investigations. In a recent issue of this journal, Kocsis, Middledorp, and Karpin (200817. Kocsis , R. N. , Middledorp , J. and Karpin , A. 2008 . Taking stock of accuracy in criminal profiling: The theoretical quandary for investigative psychology . Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice , 8 : 244 - 261 . [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]View all references) (KMK) challenged some of the methodological decisions of Snook et al. and questioned their interpretation of their meta-analytic findings. In addition, KMK suggested that the work by Snook et al., and that of Bennell, Jones, Taylor, and Snook (20062. Bennell , C. , Jones , N. , Taylor , P. and Snook , B. 2006 . Validities and abilities in criminal profiling: A critique of the studies conducted by Richard Kocsis and his colleagues . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology , 50 : 344 - 360 . [CrossRef], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]View all references) is based not on a desire to move profiling research forward but on a hidden agenda to promote an investigative psychology (IP) approach to profiling. In response, we argue that KMK have failed to consider important issues of knowledge cumulation when criticizing the meta-analysis by Snook et al. and that KMK's views with respect to IP have no basis in our previous research. Instead of trying to find a nonexistent hidden agenda in our work, we suggest that efforts would be better directed toward conducting high-quality CP research.View full textDownload full textKEYWORDScriminal profiling, investigative psychology, meta-analysis, predictive validity, psychological profilingRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228930903550541
展开▼
机译：在最近对犯罪概况（CP）文献的叙述性回顾和荟萃分析中，Snook，Eastwood，Gendreau，Goggin和Cullen（200727. Snook，B.，Eastwood，J.，Gendreau，P.，Goggin，C. and Cullen，RM 2007.清点犯罪概况：叙事回顾和荟萃分析。刑事司法和行为，34：437-453。[CrossRef]，[Web of Science®]查看所有参考文献）发现自我标记探查员和/或自我标记的探查员/经验丰富的侦探在产生准确简介的能力方面并没有决定性地超越非专业人士。结合他们发现CP文献主要基于常识的发现，他们提醒警察在调查中使用CP。在该期刊的最新一期中，Kocsis，Middledorp和Karpin（200817. Kocsis，RN，Middledorp，J.和Karpin，A. 2008.评估犯罪概况中的准确性：侦查心理学的理论困境。法医杂志Psychology Practice，8：244-261。[Taylor＆Francis Online]，[Web ofScience®]（查看所有参考文献）（KMK）对Snook等人的一些方法学决策提出了挑战。并质疑他们对荟萃分析发现的解释。另外，KMK建议Snook等人以及Bennell，Jones，Taylor和Snook的工作（20062. Bennell，C.，Jones，N.，Taylor P.和Snook，B. 2006.有效性）。和犯罪特征方面的能力：对Richard Kocsis和他的同事进行的研究的批评。《国际罪犯治疗和比较犯罪学杂志》，50：344-360。[CrossRef]，[PubMed]，[Web of Science®]查看全部参考文献）不是基于推动剖析研究前进的愿望，而是基于促进探究心理学（IP）进行剖析的隐藏议程。作为回应，我们认为KMK在批评Snook等人的荟萃分析时未能考虑知识积累的重要问题。 KMK关于知识产权的观点在我们之前的研究中没有任何依据。建议不要尝试在我们的工作中找到不存在的隐藏议程，而是建议将工作方向更好地进行高质量的CP研究。查看全文下载全文犯罪分析，调查心理学，荟萃分析，预测效度，心理分析相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“ Taylor＆Francis Online”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}；添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228930903550541
展开▼
