首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Comparison of sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella on whole broiler carcasses purchased from retail outlets.
【24h】

Comparison of sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella on whole broiler carcasses purchased from retail outlets.

机译:从零售店购买的整个肉鸡屠体中沙门氏菌检测方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

An experiment was conducted to compare the effectiveness levels of two methods in recovering Salmonella from the same carcass. One hundred fresh whole broiler chickens were purchased from retail outlets over a 5-week period (20 carcasses per week). After carcasses had been aseptically removed from the packages and giblets had been removed, the carcasses were placed in sterile bags containing 400 ml of 1% buffered peptone water, the bags were shaken for 60 s, and a 30-ml aliquot was removed and incubated for 24 h at 37 degrees C (aliquot sample). Then, an additional 130 ml of 1% buffered peptone water was immediately added to the bag with the carcass (bringing the volume to 500 ml), the bag was reshaken, and the carcass and rinse were incubated for 24 h at 37 degrees C (whole-carcass enrichment sample). Following incubation, 0.5-ml samples for the two methods were placed into 10 ml of Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth and into 10 ml of tetrathionate (Hajna) broth and incubated at 42 degrees C for 24 h. Each broth was then streaked onto BG Sulfa agar and modified lysine iron agar and incubated for 24 h at 35 degrees C. Suspected Salmonella colonies were inoculated onto triple sugar iron and lysine iron agar slants and incubated at 35 degrees C for 24 h. Presumptive positive results were confirmed by Poly O and Poly H agglutination tests. Over the 5-week period, 13% of the aliquot samples tested positive for Salmonella, compared with 38% of the whole-carcass enrichment samples from the same carcasses. Recovery rates ranged from 0 of 20 samples to 4 of 20 samples for aliquot method and from 4 of 20 samples to 10 of 20 samples for the whole-carcass enrichment method over the 5-week period. These results indicate that when small numbers of Salmonella are expected, the sampling method has a major influence on the identification of Salmonella-positive carcasses.
机译:进行了一项实验,以比较两种方法从同一car体中回收沙门氏菌的有效性水平。在5周内(每周20个cas体)从零售店购买了一百只新鲜的整只肉鸡。将尸体从包装中无菌取出并除去内脏物后,将尸体放入装有400 ml 1%缓冲蛋白ept水的无菌袋中,振摇袋60 s,取出30 ml等分试样并孵育在37℃下放置24小时(等分样品)。然后,立即将另外的130 ml 1%缓冲蛋白water水与屠体一起添加到袋子中(使体积达到500 ml),将袋子重新摇匀,将屠体和漂洗液在37摄氏度下孵育24小时(全-体富集样品)。孵育后,将两种方法的0.5 ml样品分别放入10 ml的Rappaport-Vassiliadis肉汤和10 ml的四硫代(Hajna)肉汤中,并在42摄氏度下孵育24小时。然后将每个肉汤划线到BG Sulfa琼脂和修饰的赖氨酸铁琼脂上,并在35摄氏度下孵育24小时。将疑似沙门氏菌菌落接种到三糖铁和赖氨酸铁琼脂斜面上,并在35摄氏度下孵育24小时。通过Poly O和Poly H凝集试验证实了阳性结果。在5周的时间内,等份样品中13%的沙门氏菌呈阳性,而同一屠体中的38%的whole体富集样品则为沙门氏菌。在5周的时间内,等份法的回收率范围从20个样品中的0个到20个样品中的4个,对于全car体富集方法,从20个样品中的4个到20个样品中的10个。这些结果表明,当预计沙门氏菌数量很少时,采样方法对沙门氏菌阳性car体的鉴定有重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号