首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Evaluation of invA Diversity among Salmonella Species Suggests Why Some Commercially Available Rapid Detection Kits May Fail To Detect Multiple Salmonella Subspecies and Species
【24h】

Evaluation of invA Diversity among Salmonella Species Suggests Why Some Commercially Available Rapid Detection Kits May Fail To Detect Multiple Salmonella Subspecies and Species

机译:沙门氏菌种间invA多样性的评估表明了为什么某些市售快速检测试剂盒可能无法检测到多种沙门氏菌亚种和种

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

invA is a common molecular target for Salmonella-specific detection methods and is recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual as a target for PCR confirmation of putative Salmonella isolates. Novel assays designed for the rapid detection of foodborne pathogens are often validated according to guidelines provided by validation schemes, such as the AOAC International or the International Organization for Standardization. However, these validation guidelines allow for flexibility in the validation study experimental design, which may inflate the assay's ability to detect foodborne pathogens, especially for foodborne pathogens such as Salmonella, exhibiting tremendous species diversity with 2,600 confirmed serovars. This study was conducted to (i) describe the sequence diversity of invA, across a diverse set of Salmonella serovars and (ii) evaluate the ability of two commercially available, AOAC International-validated rapid detection assays to detect a diverse collection of Salmonella spp. strains. In silico analyses identified 362 of 2,058 nucleotide sites that were variable among invA sequences from a diverse collection, representing 86 unique serovars spanning all species and subspecies. Not surprisingly, the majority of variable sites (308 of 2,058) occurred in non-Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica strains, including Salmonella bongori and the other S. enterica subspecies. In vitro testing showed that both rapid detection assays, examined here, failed to detect all Salmonella strains at 1 log above the limit of detection, with assay A failing to detect S. enterica subsp. salamae, and assay B failing to detect S. bongori. Both strains were eventually detected at 100,000 times the limit of detection. Taken together, our study highlights the need to include non-subsp. S. enterica strains in the development and validation of rapid detection methods to limit false-negative test results.
机译:invA是沙门氏菌特异性检测方法的常见分子靶标,并且被《美国食品和药物管理局细菌分析手册》推荐作为PCR确认的沙门氏菌分离株的靶标。设计用于快速检测食源性病原体的新型检测方法通常会根据验证方案(如AOAC International或国际标准化组织)提供的指南进行验证。但是,这些验证指南可为验证研究实验设计提供灵活性,这可能会提高测定法检测食源性病原体的能力,尤其是对于食源性病原体(如沙门氏菌)而言,它们显示出巨大的物种多样性,并确认了> 2,600个血清型。进行这项研究的目的是(i)在不同种类的沙门氏菌血清中描述invA的序列多样性,以及(ii)评估两种市售的,经AOAC International验证的快速检测法检测沙门氏菌属物种的多样性的能力。株。在计算机分析中,鉴定了2,058个核苷酸位点中的362个,这些位点在不同集合的invA序列中可变,代表了跨越所有物种和亚种的86个独特的血清。毫不奇怪,大多数可变位点(2,058中的308)发生在非沙门氏菌肠亚种中。沙门氏菌和其他肠炎沙门氏菌亚种。体外测试表明,此处检查的两种快速检测方法均未能在检测限以上1 log处检测到所有沙门氏菌菌株,而检测法A未检测到肠炎沙门氏菌亚种。 salamae,而分析B无法检测到S. bongori。两种菌株最终都以检测限的100,000倍被检测到。两者合计,我们的研究强调需要包括非子项。在肠炎链球菌菌株的开发和验证中,快速检测方法可限制假阴性试验结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号