...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Food Processing and Preservation >Yield, physicochemical, and antioxidant properties of Atlantic salmon visceral hydrolysate: Comparison of lactic acid bacterial fermentation with Flavourzyme proteolysis and formic acid treatment
【24h】

Yield, physicochemical, and antioxidant properties of Atlantic salmon visceral hydrolysate: Comparison of lactic acid bacterial fermentation with Flavourzyme proteolysis and formic acid treatment

机译:大西洋鲑鱼内脏水解产物的收率,理化性质和抗氧化特性:乳酸菌发酵与风味酶蛋白水解和甲酸处理的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study compares a cost-effective microbial method, involving lactic acid (LA) fermentation,rnwith the conventional formic acid (FA) treatment and Flavourzyme (FL) enzymatic hydrolysis forrnvalorizing Atlantic salmon processing waste (Viscera). LA and FA processing approaches relied onrnproduction (LA) or addition (FA) of organic acids to lower the pH and activate the inherent proteasesrnin these tissues, whereas FL processing was carried out at the optimum conditions forrnFlavourzyme (37 ℃, pH 7.0). Highest protein hydrolysate fraction recovery (~57%) was seen in LArnfermentation, while FA processing resulted in the highest protein levels (~87%) in the recoveredrnhydrolysate fraction and lowest residual fraction (~4%). In general, FL processing demonstratedrnhigher Fe(Ⅱ) chelation (73%) and ferric reducing capacity (27 mM glutathione equivalent) whereasrnLA-hydrolysates showed enhanced sacrificial antioxidant properties. Findings from this studyrnwould have implications on the application and production of salmon-based protein hydrolysates,rnespecially, from the perspective of their functionality.
机译:这项研究比较了一种具有成本效益的微生物方法,该方法涉及乳酸(LA)发酵,常规甲酸(FA)处理和Flavourzyme(FL)酶水解来强化大西洋鲑鱼加工废料(Viscera)。 LA和FA处理方法依赖于有机酸的生产(LA)或添加(FA)来降低这些组织的pH值并激活其固有的蛋白酶,而FL处理则是在风味酶的最佳条件下(37℃,pH 7.0)进行的。发酵中蛋白质水解物馏分的回收率最高(〜57%),而FA处理导致回收的水解物馏分的蛋白质水平最高(〜87%),残留分数最低(〜4%)。通常,FL加工显示出较高的Fe(Ⅱ)螯合度(73%)和铁还原能力(27 mM谷胱甘肽当量),而LA水解产物则显示出牺牲的抗氧化性能。从这项研究中发现的结果,特别是从其功能的角度来看,将对鲑鱼基蛋白质水解产物的应用和生产产生影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Food Processing and Preservation》 |2018年第6期|e13620.1-e13620.11|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada B2N5E3 Verschuren Centre for Sustainability in Energy and the Environment, Cape Breton University, Nova Scotia, Canada B1P6L2;

    Verschuren Centre for Sustainability in Energy and the Environment, Cape Breton University, Nova Scotia, Canada B1P6L2;

    Verschuren Centre for Sustainability in Energy and the Environment, Cape Breton University, Nova Scotia, Canada B1P6L2 Centre for Applied Research and Innovation, Lethbridge College, Alberta, Canada T1K1L6;

    School of Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N6N5;

    Verschuren Centre for Sustainability in Energy and the Environment, Cape Breton University, Nova Scotia, Canada B1P6L2;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号