首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Financial Regulation & Compliance >The institutional framework against money laundering and its underlying predicate crimes
【24h】

The institutional framework against money laundering and its underlying predicate crimes

机译:打击洗钱及其潜在上游犯罪的体制框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to underscore the current supranational anti-money laundering (AML) regimes articulating challenges of harnessing them as a robust framework. Some aspects of the above framework are created under the auspices of the United Nations treaties, some are regional-based initiatives while others are ad hoc arrangements. Design/methodology/approach – The paper was written on the basis of the supranational framework against money laundering such as the United Nations Convention against drug trafficking and other psychotropic substances. Owing to the limitations of the above AML model law, the paper utilised a qualitative research methodology, exploring a wide range of the current AML regimes. The paper has also exploited the revised AML framework which expands the scope of the offence to encompass, not only proceeds from drug trafficking but also serious criminal activities (smuggling, fraud, serious financial crimes, and the sale of stolen goods). Ideally, the paper has been written based on the provisions of the United Nations Convention against transnational organised crimes and its attendant three protocols adopted in Palermo (2000); and the Financial Action Task Force (2004). The foregoing regimes underscore an essential framework for the study of money laundering and its attendant predicate offences globally. Findings – The findings of the study clearly demonstrate that the current AML framework is not robust enough to caution countries against the threat of money laundering. There is a gaping gap in the law of money laundering within and between regions even though there is a global framework in place. This is presumably the reason why some countries have not fully transposed some aspects of current AML regimes locally. Social implications – The gaps in the law against money laundering – both in relation to the way they are created and enforced signify that states still need to do more collectively to stem the threat of money laundering. The current intransigence in application of AML laws in some countries sign-post the inherent challenges of globalisation of international finance. Originality/value – While there is a growing body of literature generated on supranational AML regimes, this paper is distinctly based on the interplay of global and local factors in harnessing it. Thus, the research design of this paper is connected by two strands – a review of existing supranational AML framework and the inherent challenges faced by individual states in domesticating it. The paper is also written based on some practical experiences of harnessing global AML regimes in some countries.
机译:目的–本文的目的是强调当前的超国家反洗钱(AML)制度,阐明将其作为稳健框架加以利用所面临的挑战。上述框架的某些方面是在联合国条约的主持下建立的,有些是基于区域的倡议,而另一些则是临时安排。设计/方法/方法–该文件是在反洗钱的超国家框架的基础上编写的,例如《联合国打击贩毒和其他精神药物公约》。由于上述反洗钱示范法的局限性,本文采用了定性研究的方法,探索了目前各种反洗钱制度。该文件还利用了修订后的反洗钱框架,该框架将犯罪范围扩大到不仅包括贩毒所得,而且还包括严重的犯罪活动(走私,欺诈,严重的金融犯罪和出售赃物)。理想情况下,该文件是根据《联合国打击跨国有组织犯罪公约》的规定以及巴勒莫(2000年)通过的三项议定书编写的;以及金融行动工作组(2004)。前述制度强调了全球范围内研究洗钱及其伴随的上游犯罪的基本框架。调查结果–研究结果清楚地表明,当前的反洗钱框架不足以提醒各国注意洗钱的威胁。尽管存在全球框架,但区域内和区域之间的洗钱法仍存在巨大差距。大概这就是一些国家没有在当地完全改变现行反洗钱制度某些方面的原因。社会影响–打击洗钱的法律空白–涉及创建和执行洗钱的方式,这表明国家仍然需要采取更多集体行动来遏制洗钱的威胁。当前在一些国家反洗钱法的适用不妥协标志着国际金融全球化的固有挑战。原创性/价值–尽管超国家反洗钱制度产生了越来越多的文献,但本文显然是基于全球和地方因素在利用它方面的相互作用。因此,本文的研究设计是由两个方面联系在一起的:对现有的超国家反洗钱框架的审查以及各个国家在将其驯化中所面临的固有挑战。本文也是根据一些国家利用全球反洗钱制度的一些实践经验撰写的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号