首页> 外文期刊>Journal of financial management of property and construction >Municipal charges on communal waste: do they compete with the immovable property tax?
【24h】

Municipal charges on communal waste: do they compete with the immovable property tax?

机译:市政对公共废物的收费:它们是否与不动产税竞争?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to give a recommendation to the municipalities what local tax/taxes sensu largo (a waste charge or an immovable property tax increased by a local coefficient) are to be collected to achieve expected and necessary incomes and limit the administrative costs. Design/methodology/approach - To reach the aim, it was necessary to analyze the number of municipalities increasing the property tax by the local coefficient and abolishing the charge on communal waste to save money for the waste charges administration. The evidence of municipalities applying the local coefficient was used as a basis for the research. To get the information on charges on communal waste collected in these municipalities with the local coefficient within the past at least five taxable periods, the information from Monitor was used. If there was any such a significant change, then it was necessary to use the bylaws and to do thorough analysis of the reasons. Findings - The hypothesis that a high number of municipalities in the Czech Republic are replacing the charge on communal waste with the local coefficient applicable for the immovable property tax was rejected. In the opinion of the author, the ideal approach is to have just one local tax - immovable property tax. This tax is administered by the state tax office and the revenue should cover the cost of waste management. Adopting only the property tax increased by the local coefficient, it is necessary to explain the benefits to the taxpayers, that is, locals and voters. Originality/value - The research on the given topic was never done in the Czech Republic, as there is no evidence of local charges collected in individual municipalities.
机译:目的-本文的目的是建议市政当局征收什么地方税/税sensu largo(废物费或不动产税,增加地方系数)以实现预期和必要的收入并限制行政费用。设计/方法/方法-为了达到目标,有必要分析通过地方系数增加财产税并废除公共废物收费以节省行政费用的市政机构数量。市政当局采用局部系数的证据被用作研究的基础。为了获得过去至少五个纳税期内在这些城市收集的具有当地系数的公共废物收费信息,我们使用了Monitor的信息。如果有任何如此重大的变化,则有必要使用细则并对原因进行彻底分析。调查结果-捷克共和国的许多城市正在用适用于不动产税的当地系数代替公共废物收费的假设被驳回。作者认为,理想的方法是只征收一种地方税-不动产税。该税由国家税务局管理,收入应包括废物管理费用。仅采用按地方系数增加的财产税,就必须说明对纳税人,即当地人和选民的好处。原创性/价值-在捷克共和国,从未进行过针对特定主题的研究,因为没有证据表明各个市政当局会收取当地费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号