...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Public Policy >Target-group influence and political feasibility: the case of climate policy design in Europe
【24h】

Target-group influence and political feasibility: the case of climate policy design in Europe

机译:目标群体的影响力和政治可行性:欧洲气候政策设计的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Political feasibility (or infeasibility) is often associated with target-group support (or opposition) of specific policy alternatives. We argue that target-groups’ capacity to influence the spectrum of politically feasible policy options tends to be higher when (1) target groups control resources needed by decision-makers, that (2) are agenda-setters and/or veto players in the decision-making process. In the 2008 revision of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) exemptions from the basic principle of full auctioning of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions allowances can all be traced to target-group interest representation by single veto players or blocking minorities in the European Council and the Council of Ministers. Our analysis indicates that target groups succeeded in constraining the spectrum of politically feasible policy options to the extent that their positions were unified and threats to shut down or relocate activity were perceived to be relevant, severe and credible. Our findings confirm both the significance and the limits of portfolio assignment in the Commission. Even with Directorate General (DG) Environment in an agenda-setting role, target groups acquired exemptions through their relations with veto players in the Council.View full textDownload full textKeywordsPolitical feasibility, EU climate policy, EU ETS, target group influenceRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.486991
机译:政治上的可行性(或不可行)通常与目标群体对特定政策选择的支持(或反对)相关。我们认为,当(1)目标群体控制决策者所需的资源,(2)是议程制定者和/或否决权参与者时,目标群体影响政治上可行的政策选择范围的能​​力往往会更高。决策过程。在2008年修订的欧盟排放交易计划(EU ETS)中,对完全拍卖温室气体(GHG)排放配额的基本原则的豁免都可以追溯到单一否决权参与者或阻止少数群体中的少数群体对利益集团的利益代表。欧洲理事会和部长理事会。我们的分析表明,目标群体成功地限制了政治上可行的政策选择的范围,以至于其立场统一了,并且认为关闭或迁移活动的威胁是相关的,严重的和可信的。我们的调查结果证实了委员会中投资组合分配的重要性和局限性。即使总干事(DG)环境处于议程制定角色中,目标群体也可以通过与安理会否决权参与者的关系获得豁免。查看全文下载全文关键字政治可行性,欧盟气候政策,欧盟ETS,目标群体影响力相关var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.486991

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号