...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Competition Law & Practice >New Limits to the Concept of Selectivity: The Birth of a 'General Exception' to the Prohibition of State Aid in EU Competition Law
【24h】

New Limits to the Concept of Selectivity: The Birth of a 'General Exception' to the Prohibition of State Aid in EU Competition Law

机译:选择性概念的新局限性:欧盟竞争法中禁止国家援助的“一般例外”的产生

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper has examined three judgments of the General Court in 2014 and a Commission decision. They have all found that the tax measures in question were not selective and therefore did not constitute state aid. In essence, they limited the scope of the concept of selectivity. The detection of state aid in tax measures has always been based on a comparison between a reference system and a measure that forms an exception to that system. The mere fact that some undertakings benefit from the exception has been sufficient to prove the selectivity of the measure. In the two Spanish cases the General Court ruled that that was not sufficient. It is also necessary to demonstrate that the exception is limited to certain undertakings. The Court has made it possible for tax authorities to avoid granting state aid if their tax measures are formed as exceptions. However, it is necessary that such exceptions are open to all undertakings. It is now possible to have such a thing as a 'general exception'.
机译:本文研究了2014年普通法院的三项判决和委员会的裁决。他们都发现所讨论的税收措施不是选择性的,因此不构成国家援助。本质上,它们限制了选择性概念的范围。税收措施中国家援助的发现始终基于参考系统与构成该系统例外的措施之间的比较。一些企业从例外中受益的事实足以证明该措施的选择性。在两个西班牙案件中,普通法院裁定这还不够。还必须证明该例外仅限于某些企业。法院已使税务机关有可能在其税收措施被视为例外的情况下避免给予国家援助。但是,有必要对所有企业开放此类例外。现在有可能发生“一般性例外”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号