首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health >Bunk versus conventional beds: a comparative assessment of fall injury risk
【24h】

Bunk versus conventional beds: a comparative assessment of fall injury risk

机译:双层床与传统床:跌落伤害风险的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To depict the magnitude and spectrum of childhood injuries attributable to falls from bunk beds in comparison with conventional beds and to outline sociodemographic risk factors and injury characteristics. Study design: Case-control investigation. Setting: Accident and emergency departments of four hospitals in Greece, namely a teaching children's hospital and a trauma hospital in Greater Athens and the two district hpspitals in the Magnesia county and the Corfu island. Patients: During the three year period 1996-98, 1881 children (0-14 years) presenting with bed fall injuries were recorded by the Emergency Department Injury Surveillance System (EDISS). Out of these, 197 children with falls from bunk beds served as cases and 1684 children with falls from conventional beds served as controls. Results: From the analysis and a nationwide extrapolation, it was calculated that each year about 5000 children in Greece (total population 10 million) seek medical attendance at an emergency department for a bed injury, corresponding to an estimated incidence of about 3 per 1000 children years. Out of bed fall injuries, 10.5% are from bunk beds, 10.4% from cribs, 3.1% from cots, and 76.0% from other conventional beds. Falls from the bed ladder accounted for 8% of all bunk bed injuries. Boys are at higher risk for falls from beds but there is no evidence that the proportion is different depending on the type of bed used. Relatively few falls from bunk beds are recorded outside the crowded apartments of Greater Athens or among migrant children. The increased relative risk of injuries from bunk bed falls during the sleeping hours indicates the higher risk of injury after a fall from a bunk rather than a conventional bed. Injuries from bunk bed falls are generally more serious than those from conventional bed falls (overrepresentation of brain injuries, fractures, multiple injuries, and injuries requiring hospitalisation). Overall, it can be estimated that almost half of the sleep related bunk bed injuries are easily preventable. Conclusions: Falls from bunk beds represent a non-negligible childhood injury risk. A sizeable fraction can be avoided with simple design modifications of the product, such as use of side rails in the upper bed or removal of the bed ladder when not in use.
机译:目的:描述与传统病床相比,由双层床跌落引起的儿童期伤害的程度和范围,并概述社会人口统计学危险因素和伤害特征。研究设计:病例对照研究。地点:希腊四家医院的急诊科,分别是大雅典的一家教学儿童医院和一家创伤医院,以及马格尼西亚县和科孚岛的两个区医院。患者:在1996-98的三年期间,急诊科伤害监测系统(EDISS)记录了1881名(0-14岁)发生床倒伤的儿童。其中,有197例上下铺儿童跌倒作为病例,还有1684例传统铺床跌倒儿童作为对照。结果:根据分析和全国范围的推算,据计算,希腊每年约有5000名儿童(总人口1000万人)在急诊科就床褥求医,相当于每1000名儿童约3名儿童年份。床下坠落伤害中,双层床占10.5%,婴儿床占10.4%,婴儿床占3.1%,其他常规床占76.0%。从梯床跌落占所有双层床伤害的8%。男孩从床上掉下的风险较高,但没有证据表明该比例取决于所用床的类型。在大雅典拥挤的公寓外或外来儿童中间,从双层床上掉下来的记录相对较少。在睡眠时间内,双层床掉落造成受伤的相对危险性增加,表明从双层床掉落后受伤的风险高于传统床具。上下床坠落造成的伤害通常比常规床坠落造成的伤害更严重(脑损伤,骨折,多发伤和需要住院的伤病过多)。总的来说,可以估计几乎一半的与睡眠有关的双层床伤害都是可以预防的。结论:从双层床跌落表示儿童伤害风险不可忽略。通过对产品进行简单的设计修改(例如在上层床中使用侧轨或在不使用时取下床梯),可以避免产生较大的份额。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号