首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Comparative risk assessment for new cow-level Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infections between 3 dairy production types: Organic, conventional, and conventional-grazing systems
【24h】

Comparative risk assessment for new cow-level Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infections between 3 dairy production types: Organic, conventional, and conventional-grazing systems

机译:对新的牛水平鸟分枝杆菌属ssp的比较风险评估。三种乳制品生产之间的副结核病感染:有机,常规和常规放牧系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Johne's disease, a granulomatous enteritis of ruminant animals, is a hidden threat on dairy farms, adversely affecting animal welfare as well as herd productivity. Control programs in the United States advocate for specific management practices to temper the spread of the causal organism (Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis, MAP), such as improving calving area hygiene and limiting introduction of replacement stock with unknown infection status. A need remains for direct exploration of Johne's disease prevention strategies in the United States with respect to production type. Alongside the growing demand for organic products, the safety of organic dairy practices with respect to MAP control is warranted. Further, conventional herds for which organic practices such as pasture grazing are used should be situated within the risk spectrum. We developed a risk assessment model using the US Voluntary Bovine Johne's Disease Control Program as a framework, with the goal of evaluating the risk of new cow-level MAP infections. A total of 292 organic and conventional farms in 3 states were surveyed on management practices, and an overall analysis was conducted in which each farm was first scored on individual practices using a range of "no risk" to "high risk," according to the literature. The sum of all risk factors was then analyzed to quantify and compare the risk burden for each production type. Organic herds received higher overall risk scores compared with both conventional grazing and nongrazing subtypes. To identify which factors contributed to the overall increased risk for organic herds, the management practices were categorized and evaluated by logistic regression. We determined that the increased risk incurred by organic herds was predominantly due to decisions made in the calving area and preweaned calf group. However, although certain individual risk factors related to calf management are commonly involved in prevention strategies (e.g., cow/calf separation) and were thus included in the overall risk assessment, empirical evidence linking them to the spread of MAP is lacking. Instead, these factors are problematic when executed with other management decisions, leading to a hypothesized syn-ergism of transmission risk. To this end, we developed a set of compound risk factors, which were also evaluated as outcomes in logistic regression models, with production type serving as the predictor of interest. Organic farms in our study were more susceptible to risks associated with the synergism of study variables. Notably, organic producers were most likely to allow calves to spend extended time with the dam, while also lacking a dedicated calving area. Additionally, calves in organic herds were more often permitted to nurse even with poor udder hygiene on farm. A heightened vigilance toward calving area hygiene is therefore indicated for these herds.
机译:约翰内氏病是一种反刍动物的肉芽肿性肠炎,是奶牛场的隐患,对动物福利和畜群生产力产生不利影响。美国的控制计划提倡采取特定的管理措施,以控制病原生物(禽分枝杆菌副结核菌,MAP)的传播,例如,改善产犊区的卫生状况,并限制引入感染状态未知的替代种群。在生产类型方面,仍然需要在美国直接探索Johne的疾病预防策略。除了对有机产品的需求不断增长之外,在MAP控制方面还应保证有机乳制品生产过程的安全性。此外,使用有机做法(例如牧场放牧)的常规畜群应位于风险范围之内。我们以美国《自愿牛约翰逊疾病控制计划》为框架开发了一种风险评估模型,其目的是评估新的奶牛MAP感染的风险。根据该调查,对3个州的292个有机农场和常规农场进行了管理实践调查,并进行了全面分析,其中每个农场首先针对单个实践使用了从“无风险”到“高风险”的范围进行评分。文献。然后分析所有风险因素的总和,以量化和比较每种生产类型的风险负担。与常规放牧和非放牧亚型相比,有机牧群的总体风险得分更高。为了确定哪些因素导致有机畜群的总体风险增加,通过逻辑回归对管理措施进行了分类和评估。我们确定有机牛群引起的风险增加主要是由于产犊区和断奶小牛群的决定。然而,尽管与犊牛管理有关的某些个体风险因素通常参与预防策略(例如,奶牛/犊牛分离),因此被纳入整体风险评估中,但缺乏将它们与MAP传播联系起来的经验证据。相反,这些因素在与其他管理决策一起执行时会出现问题,从而导致传输风险的假设协同效应。为此,我们开发了一组复合风险因子,这些风险因子在逻辑回归模型中也作为结果进行了评估,其中生产类型是目标变量。在我们的研究中,有机农场更容易受到与研究变量协同作用相关的风险的影响。值得注意的是,有机生产者最有可能允许小牛在大坝上度过更长的时间,同时也缺乏专门的小牛产区。此外,即使农场的乳房卫生差,也更经常允许有机牛犊进行哺乳。因此,对于这些牛群,要提高对产犊区卫生的警惕。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2016年第12期|9885-9899|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Animal Science, and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853,Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;

    Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706;

    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;

    Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853,GD Animal Health Service, 7400 AA Deventer, the Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Johne's disease; organic management; conventional management; production type;

    机译:约翰病有机管理;常规管理;生产类型;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:23:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号