首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health >Are estimates of socioeconomic inequalities in chronic disease artefactually narrowed by self-reported measures of prevalence in low-income and middle-income countries? Findings from the WHO-SAGE survey
【24h】

Are estimates of socioeconomic inequalities in chronic disease artefactually narrowed by self-reported measures of prevalence in low-income and middle-income countries? Findings from the WHO-SAGE survey

机译:通过自我报告的低收入和中等收入国家患病率的测量方法,是否在人为地缩小了慢性疾病的社会经济不平等估计? WHO-SAGE调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background The use of self-reported measures of chronic disease may substantially underestimate prevalence in low-income and middle-income country settings, especially in groups with lower socioeconomic status (SES). We sought to determine whether socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs) differ if estimated by using symptom-based or criterion-based measures compared with self-reported physician diagnoses. Methods Using population-representative data sets of the WHO Study of Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE), 2007-2010 (n=42 464), we calculated wealth-related and education-related concentration indices of self-reported diagnoses and symptom-based measures of angina, hypertension, asthma/chronic lung disease, visual impairment and depression in three 'low-income and lower middle-income countries'-China, Ghana and India-and three 'upper-middle-income countries'-Mexico, Russia and South Africa. Results SES gradients in NCD prevalence tended to be positive for self-reported diagnoses compared with symptom-based/criterion-based measures. In China, Ghana and India, SES gradients were positive for hypertension, angina, visual impairment and depression when using self-reported diagnoses, but were attenuated or became negative when using symptom-based/criterion-based measures. In Mexico, Russia and South Africa, this distinction was not observed consistently. For example, concentration index of self-reported versus symptom-based angina were: in China: 0.07 vs -0.11, Ghana: 0.04 vs -0.21, India: 0.02 vs -0.16, Mexico: 0.19 vs -0.22, Russia: -0.01 vs -0.02 and South Africa: 0.37 vs 0.02. Conclusions Socioeconomic inequalities in NCD prevalence tend to be artefactually positive when using self-report compared with symptom-based or criterion-based diagnostic criteria, with greater bias occurring in low-income countries. Using standardised, symptom-based measures would provide more valid estimates of NCD inequalities.
机译:背景自我报告的慢性病测量方法可能会大大低估低收入和中等收入国家/地区的患病率,尤其是在社会经济地位较低的人群中。我们试图确定非传染性慢性病(NCDs)患病率中的社会经济不平等现象是否与基于自我报告的医生诊断相比,是通过基于症状的评估还是基于标准的评估得出的。方法利用2007年至2010年世卫组织全球老龄化与成人健康研究(n = 42 464)的人口代表性数据集,我们计算了自我报告的诊断和症状-在三个“低收入和中低收入国家”(中国,加纳和印度)和三个“中高收入国家”(墨西哥)的基于心绞痛,高血压,哮喘/慢性肺病,视力障碍和抑郁的测量指标,俄罗斯和南非。结果与基于症状/基于标准的测量相比,自我报告的NCD患病率的SES梯度呈阳性。在中国,加纳和印度,使用自我报告的诊断方法时,SES梯度在高血压,心绞痛,视力障碍和抑郁方面呈阳性,但在使用基于症状/基于标准的措施时,SES梯度则减弱或变为负值。在墨西哥,俄罗斯和南非,这种区别未得到一致观察。例如,自我报告型与症状型心绞痛的集中指数为:中国:0.07 vs -0.11,加纳:0.04 vs -0.21,印度:0.02 vs -0.16,墨西哥:0.19 vs -0.22,俄罗斯:-0.01 vs -0.02和南非:0.37对0.02。结论与基于症状或基于标准的诊断标准相比,使用自我报告时,非传染性疾病患病率的社会经济不平等往往是假阳性,在低收入国家存在较大的偏见。使用标准化的,基于症状的措施将提供对NCD不平等的更有效的估计。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health》 |2015年第3期|218-225|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Public Health Foundation of India, 4 Institutional A, VasantKunj, New Delhi 110070, India,Department of Sociology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK;

    Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India,Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK;

    Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, Palo Alto, California, USA,Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK;

    Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India;

    Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, UK;

    Department of Sociology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK,Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK;

    Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India,Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:07:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号