首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B: Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes >Modelling the dissipation kinetics of six commonly used pesticides in two contrasting soils of New Zealand
【24h】

Modelling the dissipation kinetics of six commonly used pesticides in two contrasting soils of New Zealand

机译:模拟六种常用农药在新西兰两种对比土壤中的耗散动力学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We used three non-linear bi-phasic models, bi-exponential (BEXP), first-order double exponential decay (FODED), and first-order two-compartment (FOTC), to fit the measured degradation data for six commonly used pesticides (atrazine, terbuthylazine, bromacil, diazinon, hexazinone and procymidone) in two New Zealand soils. Corresponding DT50 and DT90 values for each compound were numerically obtained and compared against those estimated by simple first-order kinetic (SFOK) model. All 3 non-linear models gave good fit of the measured data under both soil depths and were well supported by the values obtained for the respective statistical indices (RMSE, CRM and r 2). The FOTC model gave by far the best fit for most compounds, followed by the FODED and BEXP models. Overall, DT50 values derived by non-linear models for the six compounds in soils from both sites were lower than the values obtained by the SFOK model. Differences in the SFOK and the three non-linear models derived DT90were, however, an order of magnitude higher for some compounds, while for others differences were very small. Although all three non-linear models described most data by giving excellent fits, in a few instances > 5-10% asymptotes hindered the estimation of DT90 values. This work shows that when degradation deviates from first-order kinetic, application of non-linear decay models to describe the kinetics of degradation becomes important in order to derive the true end-points for pesticides in soil.
机译:我们使用了三个非线性双相模型:双指数(BEXP),一阶双指数衰减(FODED)和一阶二室(FOTC),以拟合六种常用农药的测得降解数据(阿特拉津,叔丁嗪,溴苯甲酰胺,二嗪农,己嗪酮和嘧啶酮)在两种新西兰土壤中生长。分别获得每种化合物的相应DT 50 和DT 90 值,并将其与通过简单一阶动力学(SFOK)模型估算的值进行比较。这三种非线性模型均能很好地拟合两种土壤深度下的测量数据,并得到相应统计指标(RMSE,CRM和r 2 )的值的良好支持。到目前为止,FOTC模型最适合大多数化合物,其次是FODED和BEXP模型。总体而言,非线性模型得出的两个地点土壤中六种化合物的DT 50 值均低于SFOK模型获得的值。但是,SFOK和衍生自DT 90 的三个非线性模型之间的差异大一些,而另一些化合物的差异非常小。尽管所有三个非线性模型都通过给出很好的拟合来描述大多数数据,但在少数情况下,> 5-10%的渐近线阻碍了DT 90 值的估计。这项工作表明,当降解偏离一级动力学时,应用非线性衰减模型来描述降解动力学就很重要,这样才能得出土壤中农药的真实终点。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Landcare Research New Zealand, Hamilton, New Zealand;

    Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Christchurch, New Zealand;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:58:04

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号