...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >A case study of Australia's emissions reduction policies - An electricity planner's perspective
【24h】

A case study of Australia's emissions reduction policies - An electricity planner's perspective

机译:澳大利亚排放政策的案例研究 - 电力计划者的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Australia offers an interesting case study of climate policy effectiveness as Australia has 'tried' a wide range of policies to mixed effect. Given that more than half of Australia's greenhouse gas emissions typically come from stationary energy generation, most climate policy in Australia has focussed on electricity sector reform, particularly the uptake of variable renewable energy and the decrease of thermal power generation. Electricity supply in Australia has undergone substantial change over recent years, substantially due to these policies, and needs to continue changing in the future to meet climate change mitigation targets and ensure stable, cost-effective electricity supply. This paper is therefore written from the perspective of an electricity planner and seeks to learn from the experiences of climate policies tried over recent decades. We start by reviewing the history of Australian energy policy and a description of how the Australian electricity network is structured to operate. We examine the theory and effects of different policies tried, which range from renewable energy targets, carbon pricing schemes, subsidies for renewable energy and research and development initiatives. We make three key observations from the case analysis: (1) that there has been substantial expense and effort effectively wasted through duplicate effects of different policy mechanisms by both federal and state governments; (2) as various mechanisms enable variable renewable energy generation to increase, the market becomes distorted, increasing total system costs and decreasing system robustness and resilience; and (3) the narrowed focus of climate policy mechanisms on certain variable renewables, such as solar photovoltaic and wind generation, omitted the opportunity for uptake of scale-able low carbon, firm generation options, like nuclear power and carbon capture and storage.
机译:澳大利亚提供了一个有趣的气候政策效力案例研究,因为澳大利亚“审判了”混合效应的广泛政策“。鉴于澳大利亚的一半以上的温室气体排放通常来自静止能源发电,澳大利亚的大多数气候政策都集中在电力部门改革上,特别是可变可再生能源的吸收和热发电减少。澳大利亚的电力供应经历了近年来的大量变化,基本上是由于这些政策,并且需要在将来继续不断变化,以满足气候变化的缓解目标,并确保稳定,具有成本效益的电力供应。因此,本文从电力策划者的角度编写,并寻求从最近几十年内尝试的气候政策的经验。我们首先审查澳大利亚能源政策的历史,并描述了澳大利亚电网如何构建运作。我们研究了不同政策试验的理论和影响,从可再生能源目标,碳定价计划,可再生能源和研发举措的补​​贴范围提供。我们从案例分析中进行三个关键观察:(1)通过联邦和州各国政府的不同政策机制的重复效应,有实质性的费用和努力; (2)随着各种机制使可变可再生能源产生增加,市场变得扭曲,增加了系统成本,减少了系统鲁棒性和弹性; (3)在某些可变可再生能源(如太阳能光伏和风发电)上狭隘的气候政策机制焦点,如太阳能光伏和风发电,省略了吸收尺度低碳,坚固生成选项的机会,如核电和碳捕获和储存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号